IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rats] [sacm] CoSWID and EAT and CWT

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 29 November 2019 13:59 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C19120220 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 05:59:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RlBd0XwcJtib for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 05:59:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DEA51200E9 for <rats@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 05:59:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 763523897B; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 08:56:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A0A66D; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 08:59:37 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>
cc: "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <0d31154b-e85c-f352-2c59-08d4a0070bb6@sit.fraunhofer.de>
References: <2A12D8A3-722A-44D1-8011-218C89C8B50B@island-resort.com> <VI1PR08MB5360236E3583EBD3A78085EDFA490@VI1PR08MB5360.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <60C4E362-02FD-4DDF-BFB4-D09D358282D4@arm.com> <b5bca8a7-7e7c-4432-a1be-6cf1fc21c352@sit.fraunhofer.de> <05D67FD7-B95E-4716-B844-2F2F3A09030F@arm.com> <BB362412-1C0B-4BF6-99FF-6BE210C939B5@arm.com> <2bc157dd-deb6-9fb8-40b4-7e10722545e6@sit.fraunhofer.de> <20047.1574929414@dooku.sandelman.ca> <0d31154b-e85c-f352-2c59-08d4a0070bb6@sit.fraunhofer.de>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 08:59:37 -0500
Message-ID: <25510.1575035977@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/vubiN5K_3rn5_o1-qUgkZNeuN0A>
Subject: Re: [Rats] [sacm] CoSWID and EAT and CWT
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote Attestation Procedures <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 13:59:41 -0000

Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
    > I am in full agreement, that the entire SUIT Manifest would be
    > over-kill in the stages "boot/recovery roms". Although, I know of
    > recovery roms that do exactly that: retrieving a SUTI Manifest
    > including firmware to do... well recovery.

No, I don't think it's overkill, I think that SUIT just didn't exist, and
sometimes better is the enemy of already-deployed-good-enough-code.


-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email