Re: [Rats] Call for feedback and interest

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 04 August 2022 19:06 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91308C14CF06 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 12:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.707
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.707 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jqkxt1YzDam1 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 12:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BBF8C157B55 for <rats@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 12:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92231389A8; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 15:25:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id pgTvcPQ0JVlq; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 15:25:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62AD389A7; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 15:25:40 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1659641140; bh=TgmvKsQamj0HFgnLUGPeSw0eHIW1x2a9mNpwd0B8+Bg=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=ao1SN4cvZ5lCIb3zRaHtVZsZ29OZc3Zxhbu53Nqky1EHfkIJCKCyj04B64WYO+qea /QfPP0hDmaVDlYGdpRAQJYelSXdunvo2SdOKT6aY39OCHGy3AevsWM7PylbZhfdTo0 mUiqDfeVjOPhrFWTbXPpqUtqMkI/MujPWpYEr6HDlOUApH9Qj633+uMoHlWBcKH+Oj AYL/Z9U/M+SlnoqFE9ThdFLFYFBb6zqoBvIr5VVzJ29+O/DcjBypy7v74BL3L7y7D+ WzzY86Ol6OCNWq9hdjbQmDmGAbG8WxPe2fSipBWXYVgBipwq0bg43Wj+ffsiyNn5o0 mVTh06qyyhfxA==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C9FCFB; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 15:06:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Carl Wallace <carl@redhoundsoftware.com>, "Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <ncamwing=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <48DDA735-F18D-4851-BF07-185CD640C75A@redhoundsoftware.com>
References: <BYAPR11MB29198CCD6A38125FFBED49D0D69D9@BYAPR11MB2919.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <19156.1659543376@localhost> <48DDA735-F18D-4851-BF07-185CD640C75A@redhoundsoftware.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 15:06:51 -0400
Message-ID: <7035.1659640011@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/xJNinkkAn5ZYjjfbkPk-aNrusQo>
Subject: Re: [Rats] Call for feedback and interest
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 19:06:58 -0000

Carl Wallace <carl@redhoundsoftware.com> wrote:
    > I can move the hex dump to an appendix and base64 encode it instead in
    > the next release. I tend to favor ASCII hex for things like this so
    > CBOR or DER can be read without decoding but it's not a strong
    > preference.

I see your point... if you are sufficiently clued into to CBOR you can read
it directly, and sure it pastes into cbor.me better.  pretty2cbor.rb
certainly works for that... so as you wish.
For other people, "base64 -d" is easier and more consistent to deal with.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide