IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rats] Use cases in draft-ietf-rats-architecture-04

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 09 June 2020 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2562B3A0C6F for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 10:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tFInvqrnAEzg for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 10:51:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E18283A0C5D for <rats@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 10:51:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 887E838A38; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 13:48:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id iJCT9J6dGrmA; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 13:48:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C975E38A36; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 13:48:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13335696; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 13:51:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>
cc: "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR08MB371600C839A2EF18B0B9F374FA820@AM0PR08MB3716.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
References: <AM0PR08MB3716EF125B7B1B5ECB71C79DFA820@AM0PR08MB3716.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <27651.1591720426@localhost> <AM0PR08MB371600C839A2EF18B0B9F374FA820@AM0PR08MB3716.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 13:51:24 -0400
Message-ID: <15277.1591725084@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/ygaPTPif5D3ZD8d8mNF-a6viBDk>
Subject: Re: [Rats] Use cases in draft-ietf-rats-architecture-04
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 17:51:28 -0000

Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com> wrote:
    > Regarding the hardware watchdog I just feel it is a made-up use
    > case. Is this something people actually want to use in practice?
    > Today's use of hardware watchdogs aim to deal with non-security use
    > cases (mostly dealing with crashing software).

We've heard from Enterprise people that this is important.
It's not a constrained case.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email