RE: [Raven] BBC Online 10/2/2000: "Surveillance bill under fire"

At 10:46 AM 2/11/00 +0200, janne.haikonen@nokia.com wrote:
>You can always
>claim that the file/communication was just garbage, and when they 
>ask e.g. about some magic cookies or crypto signalling IEs that were 
>present in your file/communication you can always act stupid and
>claim that you have no knowledge of what you computer/terminal 
>does behind your back...

I think that would last about 9 milliseconds in the presence of a competent
lawyer. Let's see, you're paying how much every month for the privilege of
sending someone else something neither you nor they know or can use the
contens of? Why are you doing that? Doesn't doing so constitute some form
of denial of service attack which may itself be punishable?

_______________________________________________
raven mailing list
raven@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/raven