Re: [Raven] Comments on Draft -- Take 2

Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk> Sat, 05 February 2000 00:38 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA13663 for <raven-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Feb 2000 19:38:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA18973; Fri, 4 Feb 2000 19:28:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA18947 for <raven@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Feb 2000 19:28:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eastwood.aldigital.algroup.co.uk (eastwood.aldigital.algroup.co.uk [194.128.162.193]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA13374 for <raven@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Feb 2000 19:29:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from freeby.ben.algroup.co.uk (freeby.ben.algroup.co.uk [193.133.15.6]) by eastwood.aldigital.algroup.co.uk (8.8.8/8.6.12) with ESMTP id AAA11991; Sat, 5 Feb 2000 00:29:03 GMT
Received: from algroup.co.uk (naughty.ben.algroup.co.uk [193.133.15.107]) by freeby.ben.algroup.co.uk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id AAA04043; Sat, 5 Feb 2000 00:29:30 GMT
Message-ID: <389B6ECD.3E85B43D@algroup.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2000 00:29:01 +0000
From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
Organization: A.L. Group plc
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Chris Savage <chris.savage@crblaw.com>
CC: "IETF Wiretapping List (E-mail)" <raven@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Raven] Comments on Draft -- Take 2
References: <D1A6C6C41B4CD311965D00C04F2C8D514526E3@webaccess.crblaw.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: raven-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: raven-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Raven Discussion List <raven.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: raven@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Various People wrote:

> The IETF ... believes that the
> operation of the Internet and the needs of its users are best served by
> making sure the security properties of connections across the Internet are
> as well known as possible.

This keeps niggling at me. Surely if Internet connections were certain
to be completely insecure (i.e. any interested party could intercept the
plaintext of any connection) then this requirement would be satisfied?
But it seems clear to me that such a situation would not even remotely
be in the best interests of the Internet's users.

I'd say "...as well known as possible" should be replaced with "...as
good as possible" - except you probably need to rejig the whole sentence
to turn it back into English.

Cheers,

Ben.

--
SECURE HOSTING AT THE BUNKER! http://www.thebunker.net/hosting.htm

http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html

Y19100 no-prize winner!
http://www.ntk.net/index.cgi?back=2000/now0121.txt

_______________________________________________
raven mailing list
raven@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/raven