IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Raven] BBC Online 10/2/2000: "Surveillance bill under fire"

Ed Stone <estone@synernet.com> Sat, 12 February 2000 02:05 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA29288 for <raven-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 21:05:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA06614; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 20:57:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA06586 for <raven@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 20:56:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from fast.synernet.com (IDENT:root@fast.synernet.net [166.82.6.2] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA29099 for <raven@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 20:58:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from computername (a793c.vnet.net [166.82.194.182]) by fast.synernet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA17778 for <raven@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 20:57:37 -0500
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20000211205446.009a6c00@fast.synernet.com>
X-Sender: estone@fast.synernet.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 20:58:04 -0500
To: raven@ietf.org
From: Ed Stone <estone@synernet.com>
Subject: Re: [Raven] BBC Online 10/2/2000: "Surveillance bill under fire"
In-Reply-To: <4.1.20000211173214.0486c760@flipper.cisco.com>
References: <002201bf73f2$af29b810$0100a8c0@DIRECTOR>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Sender: raven-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: raven-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Raven Discussion List <raven.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: raven@ietf.org

> >"What is new is that for the first time the use of these techniques will be
> >properly regulated by law, and externally supervised, not least to ensure
> >that law enforcement operations are consistent with the duties imposed on
> >public authorities by the European Convention on Human Rights and the Human
> >Rights Act."
>
>This is an important point...

What is the nature and extent of the officers and arrest powers of the 
European Convention on Human Rights, and what is their warrant, search and 
seizure authority in law enforcement agencies in the UK? If the answer is 
"none", then why is this an interesting point?


--
--------------------------
Ed Stone
estone@synernet.com
--------------------------

_______________________________________________
raven mailing list
raven@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/raven

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email