Re: [Raven] German programmer "Mixter" addresses cyberattacks [OFFTOPIC]

"chefren" <chefren@pi.net> Wed, 16 February 2000 01:33 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA00037 for <raven-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Feb 2000 20:33:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA22945; Tue, 15 Feb 2000 19:43:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA22918 for <raven@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Feb 2000 19:43:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from smtpe.casema.net (smtpe.casema.net [195.96.96.172]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id TAA29194 for <raven@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Feb 2000 19:44:56 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200002160044.TAA29194@ietf.org>
Received: (qmail 25250 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2000 00:44:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO system) (195.96.121.164) by smtpe.casema.net with SMTP; 16 Feb 2000 00:44:45 -0000
From: "chefren" <chefren@pi.net>
To: raven@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 01:44:43 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: [Raven] German programmer "Mixter" addresses cyberattacks [OFFTOPIC]
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <20000215080242.A30347@progressive-systems.com>
References: <200002142315.SAA26201@ietf.org>; from chefren@pi.net on Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 12:15:37AM +0100
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.11)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Sender: raven-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: raven-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Raven Discussion List <raven.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: raven@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT

On 15 Feb 00, at 8:02, Ge' Weijers wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 12:15:37AM +0100, chefren wrote:

..

> This was already tried, in the ITU (nee CCITT). Intergovernemental
> agencies produce insane standards like X.25 and SS7. OSI is only
> used in textbooks.
>
> There's nothing significant coming out of the ITU anymore, SS7 was
> their crowning achievement of bloat and multilayered complexity. It
> still amazes me dialtone is as reliable as it is. Most of the new
> stuff is not developed in the ITU anymore (ATM etc).  X.500 never got
> off the ground because of its own weight, X.400 e-mail is almost dead
> as well.

I agree.
 
> The IETF has serves us well, its processes are far more effective than
> those of ITU or ETSI, all because of its informal, loose-knit
> structure.

"Serves" or "served", that's the question. The demands of 
the world are not heard or understood here. Techie problem?

> And because of its informal nature it is not the right
> forum to handle the politically hot potato of wiretaps.


To get further the IETF has it's weaknesses. Social 
responsibility is clearly one of them.

+++chefren



_______________________________________________
raven mailing list
raven@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/raven