[Raw] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on charter-ietf-raw-00-00: (with COMMENT)
Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 22 January 2020 19:51 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: raw@ietf.org
Delivered-To: raw@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89DD112089B; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 11:51:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: raw-chairs@ietf.org, raw@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.116.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <157972266048.12320.3799679905954952023.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 11:51:00 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/raw/1QK3OdoPAjaXVvuppa5GYC_yKBg>
Subject: [Raw] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on charter-ietf-raw-00-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: raw@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: reliable and available wireless <raw.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/raw>, <mailto:raw-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/raw/>
List-Post: <mailto:raw@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:raw-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/raw>, <mailto:raw-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 19:51:01 -0000
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-raw-00-00: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-raw/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- +1 on Alvaro Retana’s feedback. To the question of how will the WG know they covered all of the use cases, are the “newer industrial applications” referenced in “The RAW Working Group is planned to … quickly address these newer industry applications”: (a) “Aeronautical Data Communications” or (b) “IEEE Std. 802.15.4 timeslotted channel hopping (TSCH), 3GPP 5G ultra-reliable low latency communications (URLLC), IEEE 802.11ax/be, and L-band Digital Aeronautical Communications System (LDACS)”? (Not my area) Is it possible to be clearer on the purpose of the draft artifacts? If the need for new “solution work” is unclear, then why is there certainty that more supporting documents are needed?
- [Raw] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on charter-iet… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker