[Raw] Alissa Cooper's Block on charter-ietf-raw-00-02: (with BLOCK)

Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 04 February 2020 21:39 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: raw@ietf.org
Delivered-To: raw@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC0C1200F5; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 13:39:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: raw-chairs@ietf.org, raw@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.116.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Message-ID: <158085239614.15693.12020911716179839628.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 13:39:56 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/raw/D8Vhoy5p6khiLET4-B7LyNAfy1g>
Subject: [Raw] Alissa Cooper's Block on charter-ietf-raw-00-02: (with BLOCK)
X-BeenThere: raw@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: reliable and available wireless <raw.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/raw>, <mailto:raw-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/raw/>
List-Post: <mailto:raw@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:raw-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/raw>, <mailto:raw-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 21:39:56 -0000

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-raw-00-02: Block

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


I still feel that the charter is unclear on the relationship between
"Aeronautical Data Applications" and the work of this WG. The charter says this
is "one" critical application, but then uses the term "these newly identified
industry applications" and "these newer industry applications." Do those
snippets of text refer to multiple different aeronautical applications? Or do
they refer to applications in other domains? Since the aeronautical
applications are called out multiple times, are they expected to take
precedence over other applications when the use cases and requirements are

Also, this is a little pedantic but since there has been a lot of confusion
about this, I think it needs to be clarified: the charter says "RAW’s focus
will be on identifying use cases and requirements for these new applications."
Wouldn't we expect applications to flow from use cases, not the other way
around? That is, if the WG intends to invent use cases for applications that
already exist, that seems backwards.