Re: [Raw] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charter-ietf-raw-00-02: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 05 February 2020 14:27 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: raw@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: raw@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B85A120059; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 06:27:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vlc1wVKrPmAV; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 06:27:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-f195.google.com (mail-il1-f195.google.com [209.85.166.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01011120026; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 06:27:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-f195.google.com with SMTP id l4so2036912ilj.1; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 06:27:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UIkD8KNInd7pBen8A9azHOtuNO9/o2g5B7wEIPzB9HY=; b=g6ur1qAg319uVLVbchnUilIVZJvfvJKkSrJ3sg50+GdbIyjQtMa60ilxHGtG1N3C4o 93fOJvRxUBXDARnT93drqOcEUKj64ds1irLt4qiAmti5mRu57hWDWDkNxMRqvq+bap0W 2awURRCDBWKtmKsRcqdnZv4FTCzpECFWJjPFlaPe3n9dq3bBiF14bUuqUgK6PDggurNJ nLqIse0URr0NlnUiuZaoN1MYaHwHWeG5WVwvVLa9JxUklrqQ9UQENFsGMGbUWRN+SHDV PN1HldWAzQAL2kGRv5RyzFwDuxnLDv6/lz0oayV4aqm1AL5WpluSodP298c4wFvFI8A9 aRkg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXerWhJ4JaMmXnnbfACJSTIvX7CfNz0H5a3Xz3Tm6rNaeCpHlNc NJe6a1O/BIm5g6F16mSwl0oOD9s7xksPEPxV4iI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqySckG71LUZB56Trg423wwi5kD6KfEeey7BNTLGD7qw8k2dNGQ7oEpD4LrHQpV3hHXe4dRgPQrBgay3Mmqn/4M=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:8f4b:: with SMTP id j72mr31818793ild.17.1580912846136; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 06:27:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158085899496.15681.5955595910954119251.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <158085899496.15681.5955595910954119251.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 09:27:14 -0500
Message-ID: <CALaySJJNyGV+W6ZXruefzs_3OHv_tYcXq3Cvkx=Ab9tGPqbN+w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, raw-chairs@ietf.org, raw@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/raw/OhtEwek28nJs3XZBlr_vRvmeIEw>
Subject: Re: [Raw] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charter-ietf-raw-00-02: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: raw@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: reliable and available wireless <raw.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/raw>, <mailto:raw-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/raw/>
List-Post: <mailto:raw@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:raw-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/raw>, <mailto:raw-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 14:27:29 -0000

Álvaro, it might be that the working group would like the option of
"publishing" documents containing background and working-group musings
(perhaps lists of use cases and the like) only in github or only on a
wiki, and not as I-Ds.  I interpreted that as where the referenced
text was going.

Barry

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 6:30 PM Alvaro Retana via Datatracker
<noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
>
> Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
> charter-ietf-raw-00-02: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-raw/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I support the first part of Alissa's BLOCK.
>
> This may be a nit, but I still find this sentence a little confusing:
> "Additional documents may be published or exist on a git repository, the
> publication format will be agreed by the Working Group at the time the document
> is adopted by the group."
>
> The fact that the milestones point at RFCs seems to clarify the meaning of
> "published"; but the alternative to an RFC ("published") is more akin to a
> draft and not a document that exists in an external repository only.  IOW, I
> would hope that if additional documents exist, that they do so either as an
> internet-draft or an RFC.  This state is independent of the tools used for its
> development.
>
>