Re: [Raw] Call for adoption of draft-theoleyre-raw-oam-support-01

[Fabrice Theoleyre <[e-mail]>]

Hi Lou, 

Yes, this is something we are currently doing: making a clear distinction between what is specific to wireless, from what is common with "generic detnet".
We also read the rfc 5860, and it was indeed a source of inspiration. 

The current document is definitely not ready for adoption, but the objective was here to ask the opinion of everybody to improve the quality of the draft, and to fit the RAW objectives. 

Cheers,
Fabrice



> Le 7 avr. 2020 à 21:40, Lou Berger <[e-mail]> a écrit :
> 
> Hi,
> 
>     I read this document and generally like what I see. We actually don't have a document of this type for DetNet net as a whole. (Actually, most the concepts I read are really independent of wireless and are generally applicable to almost any network.) My suggestion is revise this document and break out what is generally applicable to any DetNet and what is specific to a wireless DetNet.  Once this is done, it should be apparent if there are really two documents here, one for DetNet and one for RAW, or just one for RAW.
> 
> To be clear, my view is that this document is not ready for adoption.
> 
> From a content perspective you might want to check out https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5860 and reuse some text from there.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Lou
> 
> On 3/30/20 6:13 AM, Rick Taylor wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> The authors of: draft-theoleyre-raw-oam-support-01 (have asked for a call for working group adoption of their draft.
>> 
>> The link to the draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-theoleyre-raw-oam-support/
>> 
>> This is your opportunity to express your opinion.
>> 
>> A decision will be made on/after 13th April.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Rick and Eve
>> Co-chairs
>>