Re: [Raw] Alissa Cooper's Block on charter-ietf-raw-00-02: (with BLOCK)

Alissa Cooper <> Wed, 05 February 2020 17:00 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8924A120870; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 09:00:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.b=wsi2GpHl; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.b=1N9VJnkM
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R3Y8E-kmleuK; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 09:00:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55724120898; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 09:00:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal []) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F05D21D6E; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 12:00:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 05 Feb 2020 12:00:45 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=O 8RE0YiJPGrBPQmFWV6A2+wyQWI3IbWdH0Lue6hz2Is=; b=wsi2GpHlM6WoodNJQ J/PwwzVF8jb63bqhdFtPQgKeyDov2Z5r40wkIOSAqQVyfzBS5Tqgn11if5qrujM8 UvcXD3o3Zh4n25MHheRuEKNOBwxXcQvuCHGYjjFePqSiSmIY8qu3VFNvw4qd+SMG 5URBAMdS52J5YXYyXscye2IsnKF13WUlcWBPuhK/vajsrIY5CMIWTnuukxN1vAJS YRDBl/M8E9DUnJX776HV42lsIYWs0BLITalw0yde6XhNnsJZ9jEQvo8pCPu5FqBz IuT4ul9GqyawYBuZjao0Zd+8igu2SEDPtSQAoBjPnC2jJj+1oAItWQ1fFJgWXv2G cSw/w==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=O8RE0YiJPGrBPQmFWV6A2+wyQWI3IbWdH0Lue6hz2 Is=; b=1N9VJnkMsSBNNoIk7m9JvJD3ccd010QoXiKKVzEG8Xi9E4X/1Ma3AcQQI Qz55BKjWhMuc9np0LW9On6JnpVqQa/Gny/h+cZOg4K4YtjhDU2E2DTWoS91Qm33B GY0B3KpTXHFXOWgQp+i+4T8TMpD2b3afiU6/aworW6t/LV4wIVW91sbV298vlMxi qSSRKPARtbvOafh9yWjy6lX4wMdSd/ExoPxHgVJTtK3RA0O4LdU7cbtJLHH58T1d /XQK4laCpnkRa3iVHU1t8sZAqkKFr4OSDelX5n11WTKS2l3MR2qQmbgVLEpBquCH zBoFwamWXiESS7MDkj7c1tenfL+Ow==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:vPQ6Xp1EJZJcwsIrbu7Yuvonu0vLlpmSVVUB8NkiQOwrJgTJK-lEpA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrhedugdelvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtdejnecuhfhrohhmpeetlhhishhs rgcuvehoohhpvghruceorghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinheqnecuffhomhgrih hnpehprhhoohhfphhoihhnthdrtghomhenucfkphepudejfedrfeekrdduudejrdekvden ucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegrlhhish hsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhn
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:vPQ6XkU6ZL3Y4ZVstnm6zW13Ja-H2k5WkL9Bm4lTM-SCCAGfjgzUuA> <xmx:vPQ6Xk66Tf-dhwsL4rU-EnKuN71IBgC9grjF80WrVLqKJPkOOkT6XQ> <xmx:vPQ6XrJwYfx6N3qWjh_zGx-Eium8Kq7dPDLMIxhuDYuB6i1LVPV0eQ> <xmx:vfQ6XsmnqRZMN_qdWUa1mJd61qtBrFd1G7Q94iYVJwryPZRkAoWvsA>
Received: from (unknown []) by (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F3F273280062; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 12:00:43 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Alissa Cooper <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 12:00:43 -0500
Cc: IESG <>, "" <>, "" <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <>
References: <> <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Raw] Alissa Cooper's Block on charter-ietf-raw-00-02: (with BLOCK)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: reliable and available wireless <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 17:00:56 -0000

Hi Deborah,

> On Feb 5, 2020, at 11:49 AM, BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A <> wrote:
> Hi Alissa,
> Please refer to Pascal’s reply for background.
> I didn’t intend to scope this to only aeronautical applications. I was only trying to point to it as one of the critical. As the use cases are under discussion, I didn’t want at this time to give “the answer”. The use case document has more information.
> As you and Alvaro are looking for more detail, would this sentence added to the end of the second paragraph help?
> “Other example wireless applications include Industrial, Pro Audio and Video, Gaming, and Edge Robotics.”

Yes. I would recommend not capitalizing any of the application names in the charter.

> The intention of why this is not scoped specifically to aeronautical is because the hope is to find a common solution for multiple applications similar to the detnet, teas, and ccamp approach.
> On your second part questioning which is first - applications or use cases- I’m not sure the confusion. Some of these applications already are existing with proprietary solutions. Others as Pascal noted are waiting for technology improvements. Can you provide suggested rewording to help us understand?

RAW’s focus will be on specifying use cases associated with these new applications and defining requirements derived from them.

> Thanks for your interest!
> Deborah 
>> On Feb 4, 2020, at 4:40 PM, Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <> wrote:
>> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
>> charter-ietf-raw-00-02: Block
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> I still feel that the charter is unclear on the relationship between
>> "Aeronautical Data Applications" and the work of this WG. The charter says this
>> is "one" critical application, but then uses the term "these newly identified
>> industry applications" and "these newer industry applications." Do those
>> snippets of text refer to multiple different aeronautical applications? Or do
>> they refer to applications in other domains? Since the aeronautical
>> applications are called out multiple times, are they expected to take
>> precedence over other applications when the use cases and requirements are
>> defined?
>> Also, this is a little pedantic but since there has been a lot of confusion
>> about this, I think it needs to be clarified: the charter says "RAW’s focus
>> will be on identifying use cases and requirements for these new applications."
>> Wouldn't we expect applications to flow from use cases, not the other way
>> around? That is, if the WG intends to invent use cases for applications that
>> already exist, that seems backwards.
>> -- 
>> Raw mailing list