Re: [Raw] Barry Leiba's No Record on charter-ietf-raw-00-00: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba <> Sat, 18 January 2020 17:22 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5C612003E; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 09:22:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.401
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IS_PJXAZe_k6; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 09:22:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9523C120024; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 09:22:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id d15so29450420iog.3; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 09:22:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oO3H7kRAnQWi3/AVGNlrSP5c9W0fpJ7QcZIfZ06xbk0=; b=IpRc+xpT4M5vG8dU+LdfWskPjUrW+zNNufEWON48zAOBqvhdQ5iRVKPHSeLiVkPYDD Dayxj1pza0IaNKopFWBYFuBM8hsUm+WF6jK+Grc9ghBRrjdvGLdxmjxgbFr61KEw3waE Tqi9RwinMjlClXk2vhuCCAupG6K7U+4TIghQIglxOxs1SM6tchadyhSoL2r7ZPQPYEPK LX/+5kWbpraq8OKgLV50Zxa0l2P+Px0AasDWNQJBZFDeybI+arg2mL+TzcRC8QAb0MHn QJcGG6+ptHV7MvYGT5oDx40ZBNGGw+MVHrGmywVqbHfOvWZexYxInIgVqFkY+54PUEon KFjg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVX94cUuqrmSAnUWdDZceySUbnj9idpCIgyLL9sASfpsT7rqsqh t2RMt6p9/7K7jLXnNOkk2mcL/RQq7kYClfp20QQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx0yvtjvx3+hRsNKlwEKNfaD0w1/etfF1gqSYEr7c6HslBG6lPFqNqhMueh+AEhgt2gaDDPVzFlpvH4grSaBtw=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:8f41:: with SMTP id r62mr35171523iod.140.1579368142624; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 09:22:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Barry Leiba <>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 12:22:11 -0500
Message-ID: <>
Cc: The IESG <>, "" <>, "" <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Raw] Barry Leiba's No Record on charter-ietf-raw-00-00: (with COMMENT)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: reliable and available wireless <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 17:22:25 -0000

Thanks for the quick response, Deborah.

> So I was very careful - I didn't want to hint at the solution in the charter at this time - it may end up
> being in INT or Routing or both. Considering the charter is about identifying what needs to be
> done - do you feel it is necessary to identify/scope to one area vs. another at this time in the
> charter life?

No... I was looking for more differentiation of the work, and no more
than that.  But if you feel that the vagueness is useful for getting
the right discussions going, and given that it is -- as is quite clear
in the charter -- just for discussion and Informational exposition
now, I'm fine with it as it is.  I'm off to record a "No Objection"