Re: [Rdma-cc-interest] Side meeting plans at IETF-106 - network fast feedback
"Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com> Tue, 12 November 2019 13:36 UTC
Return-Path: <roni.even@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: rdma-cc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rdma-cc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92DB612002E for <rdma-cc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 05:36:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hRl45oDKpCU5 for <rdma-cc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 05:35:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC2E0120033 for <rdma-cc-interest@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 05:35:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from LHREML711-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 6E8B783FD1FF7016EF55 for <rdma-cc-interest@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:35:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DGGEMM401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.209) by LHREML711-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:35:54 +0000
Received: from DGGEMM526-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.96]) by DGGEMM401-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.3.20.209]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 21:35:49 +0800
From: "Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
CC: "rdma-cc-interest@ietf.org" <rdma-cc-interest@ietf.org>, Paul Congdon <paul.congdon@tallac.com>
Thread-Topic: [Rdma-cc-interest] Side meeting plans at IETF-106 - network fast feedback
Thread-Index: AdWZUOxsi4WQYRFUR0mpYlboQPrO4v//iDQA//9uYkA=
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:35:49 +0000
Message-ID: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD23DB87C3@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD23DB8772@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com> <8CF80033-2D29-49BA-913D-36AFFAA20295@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <8CF80033-2D29-49BA-913D-36AFFAA20295@eggert.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.210.169.225]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rdma-cc-interest/QEHJWPM6y6XtYtjhFcRzw5C1Td8>
Subject: Re: [Rdma-cc-interest] Side meeting plans at IETF-106 - network fast feedback
X-BeenThere: rdma-cc-interest@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Congestion Control for Large Scale HPC/RDMA Data Centers <rdma-cc-interest.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rdma-cc-interest>, <mailto:rdma-cc-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rdma-cc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rdma-cc-interest@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rdma-cc-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rdma-cc-interest>, <mailto:rdma-cc-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:36:01 -0000
Hi Lars, Thanks for the comments I will clarify in the next revision that the focus is on the different congestion reporting alternatives and that the reference documents are examples of the alternatives. Roni -----Original Message----- From: Rdma-cc-interest [mailto:rdma-cc-interest-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lars Eggert Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 2:53 PM To: Roni Even (A) Cc: rdma-cc-interest@ietf.org; Paul Congdon Subject: Re: [Rdma-cc-interest] Side meeting plans at IETF-106 - network fast feedback Hi, On 2019-11-12, at 14:08, Roni Even (A) <roni.even@huawei.com> wrote: > RE: The motivation was not a survey but to show the different alternatives for providing congestion information and propose direction for reporting congestion and handling it for Data Centers. I sure did not cover all related work. ah. That doesn't come across at all. It's not clear that the alternatives (both in terms of categories and in terms of proposals) in the draft and in the list below are only *some* of the alternatives - the draft sounds like it thinks it is all of them. It would be good to make this much clearer, and also talk about *why* only these were chosen and not some of the many others. Lars > The alternatives from the network perspective: > > 1. Based on estimation of network status: Traditional TCP, Timely. > > 2. Network provides limited information: DCQCN using only ECN, SCE > and L4S > > 3. Network provides some information: HPCC. > > 4. Network provides proactive control: RCP (Rate Control Protocol) > > Proposing 3 and 4 for future direction. We did some initial tests and will present them in the side meeting (not enough time in ICCRG) > > If there will be an interest also in a more comprehensive survey I will be happy to get help from people who would like to see such a survey. > > Roni > > -- > Rdma-cc-interest mailing list > Rdma-cc-interest@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rdma-cc-interest > > -- > Rdma-cc-interest mailing list > Rdma-cc-interest@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rdma-cc-interest -- Rdma-cc-interest mailing list Rdma-cc-interest@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rdma-cc-interest
- Re: [Rdma-cc-interest] Side meeting plans at IETF… Roni Even (A)
- Re: [Rdma-cc-interest] Side meeting plans at IETF… Lars Eggert
- Re: [Rdma-cc-interest] Side meeting plans at IETF… Roni Even (A)