Re: [re-ECN] re-ECN Digest, Vol 7, Issue 115
SATOH@pacific.bb.ntt-at.co.jp, Daisuke <daisuke.satoh@ntt-at.co.jp> Sat, 12 September 2009 13:50 UTC
Return-Path: <daisuke.satoh@ntt-at.co.jp>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 504403A680A for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Sat, 12 Sep 2009 06:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-0.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599,
HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tp9OwG-mj0Fc for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 06:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sg.ntt-at.co.jp (roma.ntt-at.co.jp [202.253.160.19]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 678053A67EB for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Sat, 12 Sep 2009 06:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 81996 invoked by alias); 12 Sep 2009 13:51:33 -0000
Received: from gwall1.bb.ntt-at.co.jp (192.168.5.201) by
subgate.bb.ntt-at.co.jp with SMTP; 12 Sep 2009 13:51:33 -0000
Received: (from root@localhost) by gwall1.bb.ntt-at.co.jp (8.13.1/8.13.1) id
n8CDpN4k015869; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:51:23 +0900
Received: from suez.bb.ntt-at.co.jp [192.168.2.9] by gwall1.bb.ntt-at.co.jp
with ESMTP id YAA15868; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:51:23 +0900
Received: from pacific.bb.ntt-at.co.jp (suez [127.0.0.1]) by
suez.bb.ntt-at.co.jp (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id n8CDpM0n031969;
Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:51:22 +0900
Received: from atmail11.am.ntt-at.co.jp (atmail11.am.ntt-at.co.jp
[192.168.5.151]) by pacific.bb.ntt-at.co.jp (8.13.1/cf/pacific) with ESMTP id
n8CDpNE1094489; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:51:23 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from
daisuke.satoh@ntt-at.co.jp)
Received: from InfinityMailEngine-Ver-4.10 (cinfo.bb.ntt-at.co.jp
[192.168.4.32]) by atmail11.am.ntt-at.co.jp (Postfix) with SMTP id
9A0BA3273AE; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:51:17 +0900 (JST)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.2088.1252695246.4737.re-ecn@ietf.org>
References: <mailman.2088.1252695246.4737.re-ecn@ietf.org>
To: re-ecn@ietf.org
From: SATOH@pacific.bb.ntt-at.co.jp, Daisuke <daisuke.satoh@ntt-at.co.jp>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:51:17 +0900
Message-Id: <20090912225117.674314.daisuke.satoh@ntt-at.co.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: InfinityMailEngine_Ver_4.10
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] re-ECN Digest, Vol 7, Issue 115
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:50:55 -0000
Dear Bob, I am interesting in the BoF. Reagards, Daisuke >>> >Folks, >>> > >>> >I'd like to try to arrange a Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Nov >>> >at the Hiroshima IETF. If so, we have to notify the area directors v >>> >soon - by 24:00 UTC Mon 7 Sep 09. #1 gating function for Area >>> >Directors: activity on an ietf list. >>> > >>> >Therefore, pls respond preferably *on this list* if you're >>> >interested in being involved, no matter how insignificantly, e.g. >>> >