IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g?

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 29 September 2009 00:20 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73FC63A693C for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:20:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uMo-pqO-SUdj for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:20:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905833A67AA for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:20:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; l=640; q=dns/txt; s=sjiport06001; t=1254183734; x=1255393334; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com>|Subject:=20Re: =20[re-ECN]=20Acronym=20for=20BoF=20/=20w-g?|Date:=20Mon, =2028=20Sep=202009=2017:22:10=20-0700|Message-Id:=20<5CE5 D41E-985B-4CA8-87A7-7E22372CA45B@cisco.com>|To:=20Bob=20B riscoe=20<rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>|Cc:=20re-ECN=20unIETF =20list=20<re-ecn@ietf.org>|Mime-Version:=201.0=20(Apple =20Message=20framework=20v936)|Content-Transfer-Encoding: =207bit|In-Reply-To:=20<200909290001.n8T01N3X030957@baghe era.jungle.bt.co.uk>|References:=20<200909281832.n8SIWijX 024923@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>=20<903258E2-B4BF-490F-80 2A-8D4AFFBE59CC@cisco.com>=20<200909290001.n8T01N3X030957 @bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>; bh=4f9PaK13IHngZUvMxqPqB05oBIgbycD2PIQNRU9/eSI=; b=GHjzEVvjw65q1xfBuxQg1V8WTIFCa9c9SqHAOGU4bhpOGn7LrIuMWS3J QtzZ0Anh7jLIeYmFhiOnn3tbxiEiFlmTQ3wV2Uplvu6mP/TEf53qaLbBu 5WEdwe6i4VqiSp/N9qEWF1wqOZ4BSXSbA9yMA0f7qARljIOo4anBz3UWk E=;
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-6.cisco.com; dkim=pass (signature verified [TEST]) header.i=fred@cisco.com
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAI/vwEqrR7PE/2dsb2JhbADAIYhTAY5mBYQe
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,469,1249257600"; d="scan'208";a="398135524"
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Sep 2009 00:22:13 +0000
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (sj-core-3.cisco.com [171.68.223.137]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n8T0MD48002423; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:22:13 -0700
Received: from stealth-10-32-244-221.cisco.com (stealth-10-32-244-221.cisco.com [10.32.244.221]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8T0MD3d008675; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:22:13 GMT
Message-Id: <5CE5D41E-985B-4CA8-87A7-7E22372CA45B@cisco.com>
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
To: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <200909290001.n8T01N3X030957@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:22:10 -0700
References: <200909281832.n8SIWijX024923@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk> <903258E2-B4BF-490F-802A-8D4AFFBE59CC@cisco.com> <200909290001.n8T01N3X030957@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=640; t=1254183733; x=1255047733; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[re-ECN]=20Acronym=20for=20BoF=20/=20w- g? |Sender:=20; bh=4f9PaK13IHngZUvMxqPqB05oBIgbycD2PIQNRU9/eSI=; b=W1zhrqaPGfoLxTb8i+MhTebOb8bxwU2kIqgkB+RgIpUB4RNQNYR6SwnHtD 9cSP7eUKwnpddP0e6nMPB8olTJgU5GQuGh2JXMzsndH4DN761/MYJnk5V26E UWhBHKldCT;
Cc: re-ECN unIETF list <re-ecn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:20:55 -0000

On Sep 28, 2009, at 5:01 PM, Bob Briscoe wrote:

>> That brings me back to "congestion exposure" or "congestion exposure
>> experiments".
>
> What about an acronym?
> Do you think Kwok's concern over becoming a CEX pot needs heeding?

Kwok has a point, but personally it doesn't bother me as much; this  
thread will probably be the longest thread on the topic, and it's not  
all that long. We could discuss come of the acronyms that have been  
proposed, and some that have made it through.

Personally, I think this is a case for the AAAAA. ATTYOB. Most of our  
real problems are BKAM. BTDTGTS.

AWHFY?

BTAICBW...

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email