[re-ECN] Congestion Exposure BoF request for Hiroshima

John Leslie <john@jlc.net> Mon, 07 September 2009 16:13 UTC

Return-Path: <john@jlc.net>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA75328C197 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 09:13:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.283
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.283 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.316, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5DpxXgkQ0ELs for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 09:13:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.jlc.net (mailhost.jlc.net [199.201.159.9]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E31E828C194 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 09:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mailhost.jlc.net (Postfix, from userid 104) id 304B333C39; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 12:14:01 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 12:14:01 -0400
From: John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
To: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
Message-ID: <20090907161401.GQ8532@verdi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Cc: Ken Carlberg <ken.carlberg@gmail.com>, re-ECN unIETF list <re-ecn@ietf.org>, Steven BLAKE <sblake@extremenetworks.com>, "Woundy, Richard" <Richard_Woundy@cable.comcast.com>
Subject: [re-ECN] Congestion Exposure BoF request for Hiroshima
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 16:13:43 -0000

> 
> Attached is my attempt so far. I started again - I'm happy with it so 
> far, but it needs the specifics added at the end, where indicated.

   I commend Bob on what he's written. It's good, even if a bit long...

   For the last three items:
] 
] TBA: Vision. Relax transport constraints. Congestion != impairment.

   Don't bother.

] TBA: Proposed working group deliverables

   Hmm... There needs to be a specific document defining usage of bits
in an IP header. It needs to be either Experimental or Proposed Standard,
and we need to say which.

   There needs to be a document (quite possibly the same one) saying
what Congestion-Exposure-aware routers may do with these bits; and
what we expect of non-Congestion-Exposure-aware routers to NOT do.

   I'm not certain what we need beyond those, though we will need
Security Considerations somewhere.

   I expect we're looking for Experimental status; and that suggests
three deliverables: one stating usage of bits, one evaluating the
results of the experiment, and one detailing Security issues.

   I don't thing we need to list more deliverables than that in a
BoF request.

] TBA: Proposed BoF Agenda.

   Copy most anyone else's. ;^)

--
John Leslie <john@jlc.net>