Re: [re-ECN] ECN fundamentals pt2/2 (was: Re: Name for BoF?)
"Joe Babiarz" <jbabiarz@istop.com> Fri, 02 October 2009 15:01 UTC
Return-Path: <jbabiarz@istop.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 23CC53A684F for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 2 Oct 2009 08:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.27 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.465,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8aDkVRlpJCm3 for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 08:01:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cat.cia.com (cat.cybersurf.net [209.197.145.185]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE853A676A for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Fri, 2 Oct 2009 08:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from i209-195-104-32.cia.com ([209.195.104.32] helo=Joe) by
cat.cia.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mtjeb-000088-Ff;
Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:02:41 -0600
From: "Joe Babiarz" <jbabiarz@istop.com>
To: <philip.eardley@bt.com>, <mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de>,
<re-ecn@ietf.org>, <menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
References: <200910021028.22079.mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de>
<4A916DBC72536E419A0BD955EDECEDEC063638BB@E03MVB1-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
In-Reply-To: <4A916DBC72536E419A0BD955EDECEDEC063638BB@E03MVB1-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 11:02:44 -0400
Message-ID: <001201ca4371$660ec590$322c50b0$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcpDOlEVoUU3UAUhT+KpRMIF8zfg+AAAtVQwAAzNAeA=
Content-language: en-us
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] ECN fundamentals pt2/2 (was: Re: Name for BoF?)
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:01:22 -0000
Would like to add that the protocol should be designed so that it does not discourage ISPs from increasing capacity of their networks. We do not want ISPs be making more money because their network is congested. Regards, Joe. jbabiarz@istop.com -----Original Message----- From: re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of philip.eardley@bt.com Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 5:08 AM To: mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de; re-ecn@ietf.org; menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de Subject: Re: [re-ECN] ECN fundamentals pt2/2 (was: Re: Name for BoF?) I agree. In practice I guess that the consumer will have a choice between (say) 3 tiers of service (basic, plus, super advanced). although different monthly congestion allowances (& maybe difference maximum congestion rates) will be part of that, most consumers won't really understand it (just as today most don't understand what 20mb/s or 1gb mean). But there are independent experts that check comparative performance of different ISPs, and you can run a program to check what performance you actually get. -----Original Message----- From: re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mirja Kuehlewind Sent: 02 October 2009 09:28 To: re-ecn@ietf.org; menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de Subject: Re: [re-ECN] ECN fundamentals pt2/2 (was: Re: Name for BoF?) Hi Michael, On Friday 02 October 2009 07:32:18 Michael Menth wrote: > Apart from that, I wonder whether a monthly congestion allowance or a > maximum congestion rate can be sold to the customer because that is more > abstract and harder to verify for the user. Even I do not know what I > get for a congestion allowance of 1 MB/month or a maximum congestion > rate of 10 KB/s. That was one of the criticisms I've heard when > discussing about re-feedback. Opinions? > I don't see that you have to sell the congestion rate to the costumer. It's just one part of the contract which will have some more or less meaningful names like "fast access" or "high speed access". People don't know what the max. access speed in todays contracts means neither... Mirja -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Dipl.-Ing. Mirja Kühlewind Institute of Communication Networks and Computer Engineering (IKR) University of Stuttgart, Germany Pfaffenwaldring 47, D-70569 Stuttgart web: www.ikr.uni-stuttgart.de email: mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de tel: +49(0)711/685-67973 ------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ re-ECN mailing list re-ECN@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn _______________________________________________ re-ECN mailing list re-ECN@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.14.3/2409 - Release Date: 10/02/09 06:46:00
- [re-ECN] ECN fundamentals pt2/2 (was: Re: Name fo… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] ECN fundamentals pt2/2 (was: Re: Nam… Michael Menth
- Re: [re-ECN] ECN fundamentals pt2/2 (was: Re: Nam… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [re-ECN] ECN fundamentals pt2/2 (was: Re: Nam… philip.eardley
- Re: [re-ECN] ECN fundamentals pt2/2 Matthew Ford
- Re: [re-ECN] ECN fundamentals pt2/2 Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [re-ECN] ECN fundamentals pt2/2 (was: Re: Nam… Michael Menth
- Re: [re-ECN] ECN fundamentals pt2/2 STUART VENTERS
- Re: [re-ECN] ECN fundamentals pt2/2 (was: Re: Nam… Joe Babiarz
- Re: [re-ECN] ECN fundamentals pt2/2 (was: Re: Nam… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] ECN fundamentals pt2/2 Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] ECN fundamentals pt2/2 (was: Re: Nam… philip.eardley
- Re: [re-ECN] ECN fundamentals pt2/2 Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] ECN fundamentals pt2/2 (was: Re: Nam… Bob Briscoe