Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls bash: Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF inHiroshima?

"Agarwal, Anil" <Anil.Agarwal@viasat.com> Fri, 04 September 2009 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <anil.agarwal@viasat.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0F13A6A46 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 12:53:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q7JZzaY1L5hz for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 12:53:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viasat.com (hawk.viasat.com [12.198.241.145]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C7D3A6819 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 12:53:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([172.31.1.23]) by hawk.viasat.com with ESMTP id 5B7LFJ1.1587878; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:50:00 -0400
Received: from VGAEXCH01.hq.corp.viasat.com ([172.31.1.20]) by VGAEXCH02.hq.corp.viasat.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 4 Sep 2009 15:55:04 -0400
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 15:53:14 -0400
Message-ID: <0B0A20D0B3ECD742AA2514C8DDA3B0650295F587@VGAEXCH01.hq.corp.viasat.com>
In-Reply-To: <200909041536.n84Fah0G028653@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls bash: Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF inHiroshima?
Thread-index: AcotdZ326zs8RhNrSqekCx3Nrr4uMgAI56sQ
From: "Agarwal, Anil" <Anil.Agarwal@viasat.com>
To: "Bob Briscoe" <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>, "re-ECN unIETF list" <re-ecn@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Sep 2009 19:55:04.0077 (UTC) FILETIME=[983B9BD0:01CA2D99]
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls bash: Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF inHiroshima?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 19:53:59 -0000

Bob,

I can review it.

Anil

Anil Agarwal
ViaSat Inc.
20511 Seneca Meadows Parkway
Germantown, MD 20876
(W) 240-686-4404
 

-----Original Message-----
From: re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Bob Briscoe
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 11:37 AM
To: re-ECN unIETF list
Subject: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls bash: Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF
inHiroshima?

Folks,

Does anyone want to help co-author the BoF proposal (by Monday night)?
Or specifically commit to review it?


Bob


>Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:32:25 +0100
>To: re-ecn@ietf.org
>From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
>Subject: Pls bash: Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Hiroshima?
>
>Hi Folks,
>
>I'd like to try to arrange a Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Nov 
>at the Hiroshima IETF. Pls bash the following proposals.
>
>A/ Basic idea: Expose Congestion at network layer, so operators can 
>encourage endpoint behaviours that minimise congestion while 
>maximising performance (e.g. LEDBAT).
>
>B/ Which Area?
>I suggest we should notify Int Area & Transport Area, but I imagine 
>Transport Area would own this.
>
>C/ Community (see separate mail)
>
>D/ Ultimate documents to deliver (draft charter milestones):...?
>1. (INF) Motivating cases for congestion exposure
>2. (EXP) protocol spec (re-ECN is one proposal)
>    - choosing an encoding in IP, plus alternative encodings in an
appendix
>3. <if the encoding uses bit 48 in IPv4>
>    (STD) Reassign value 1 of bit 48 from 'reserved' to 'experimental
use'
>    Also describe conditions on experiments, e.g.:
>    - confined in space and in time
>    - multiple simultaneous experiments with same value would need v 
> strong case
>4. (INF) Report(s) on experimental uses of protocols
>
>E/ Supporting text to work on
>- BoF Description     (by 07 Sep 09 BoF deadline - Monday!!)
>- Proposed BoF Agenda (by 28 Oct 09 WG agendas deadline)
>- Problem statement   (by 19 Oct 09 I-D deadline)
>- Protocol proposal(s) (by 19 Oct 09 I-D deadline)
>- have I missed anything?
>
>F/ Other requirements
>- What's the "elevator pitch"?
>- Demo? Of what? The protocol, or a use of the protocol? What use?
>- BoF Chairs x2 (Rich Woundy has volunteered)
>
>_____
>Minutes of Stockholm Bar BoF where we discussed this, and links to 
>supporting docs so far:
><http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/tsv/trac/wiki/re-ECN>
>
>
>
>Bob
>
>________________________________________________________________
>Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research

________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research 

_______________________________________________
re-ECN mailing list
re-ECN@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn