Re: [re-ECN] VIability issue #2
<toby.moncaster@bt.com> Thu, 05 November 2009 12:48 UTC
Return-Path: <toby.moncaster@bt.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 7DD6928C1B9 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Thu, 5 Nov 2009 04:48:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.350,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kUvG14NIGHdu for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 04:48:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp2.smtp.bt.com (smtp2.smtp.bt.com [217.32.164.150]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D9228C13E for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Thu, 5 Nov 2009 04:48:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from E03MVZ1-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.30.61]) by
smtp2.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Thu, 5 Nov 2009 12:48:35 +0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 12:47:47 -0000
Message-ID: <AEDCAF87EEC94F49BA92EBDD49854CC70DCB16F1@E03MVZ1-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net>
In-Reply-To: <4AF26B76.7090308@thinkingcat.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [re-ECN] VIability issue #2
Thread-Index: Acpd3jF/tTvBDGItRV2oolV0GC8vxQANyx4A
References: <4AF26B76.7090308@thinkingcat.com>
From: <toby.moncaster@bt.com>
To: <leslie@thinkingcat.com>, <re-ecn@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Nov 2009 12:48:35.0431 (UTC)
FILETIME=[49D29770:01CA5E16]
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] VIability issue #2
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:48:14 -0000
> -----Original Message----- > From: re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Leslie Daigle > Sent: 05 November 2009 06:07 > To: re-ecn@ietf.org > Subject: [re-ECN] VIability issue #2 > > > [This attempts to outline an issue that could be perceived as > challenging the viability of congestion exposure work. The goal is to > capture the issue, as well as itemize reasonable supporting arguments > (for viability) and remaining questions to be addressed. Please > respond > with suggestions as needed for each section. ] > > Viability Issue #2 > > The expectation is that congestion exposure information will be carried > in IP packet headers. Is there really enough room to do that > effectively (in IPv4)? Hopefully, but it is certainly tight... The key thing here is that the IETF may have to actually decide the time has come to "unreserve" the reserved flag! > > > For discussion: > This assumes tight timing -- that feedback is received and acted upon > such that subsequent flows will experience the same or similar network > state. What are the implications (or likelihood) of different paths? > Or, are there other network state changes that will (could) change in > that timeframe (now or in future developments). There are issues to be resolved here about how quickly congestion may be assumed to vary, how much impact a given flow may have on that congestion level and as Leslie points out, the impact of path changes. We also will later have to address how to aggregate and use the CONEX info (eg using moving averages or counters...) > > Leslie. > > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > "Reality: > Yours to discover." > -- ThinkingCat > Leslie Daigle > leslie@thinkingcat.com > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > re-ECN mailing list > re-ECN@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn
- [re-ECN] VIability issue #2 Leslie Daigle
- Re: [re-ECN] VIability issue #2 toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] VIability issue #2 João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] VIability issue #2 HeinerHummel
- Re: [re-ECN] VIability issue #2 toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] VIability issue #2 HeinerHummel
- Re: [re-ECN] VIability issue #2 HeinerHummel
- Re: [re-ECN] VIability issue #2 Tom Taylor
- Re: [re-ECN] VIability issue #2 John Leslie
- Re: [re-ECN] VIability issue #2 HeinerHummel
- Re: [re-ECN] VIability issue #2 Woundy, Richard
- Re: [re-ECN] VIability issue #2 toby.moncaster