Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?

Dragana Damjanovic <Dragana.Damjanovic@uibk.ac.at> Tue, 08 September 2009 12:47 UTC

Return-Path: <Dragana.Damjanovic@uibk.ac.at>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB7E3A699C for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 05:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.43
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.43 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ij+2rDQFMErG for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 05:47:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.uibk.ac.at (lmr1.uibk.ac.at [138.232.1.142]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A473A67EB for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 05:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (lwm1.uibk.ac.at [138.232.1.160] Dragana.Damjanovic@uibk.ac.at) by smtp.uibk.ac.at (8.13.8/8.13.8/F1) with ESMTP id n88Cm3t7004170 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 14:48:03 +0200
Received: from habicht.dps.uibk.ac.at (habicht.dps.uibk.ac.at [138.232.66.181]) by web-mail1.uibk.ac.at (IMP) with HTTP for <c703385@mail1.uibk.ac.at>; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 14:48:02 +0200
Message-ID: <1252414082.4aa652830002e@web-mail1.uibk.ac.at>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 14:48:03 +0200
From: Dragana Damjanovic <Dragana.Damjanovic@uibk.ac.at>
To: re-ecn@ietf.org
References: <200909041611.n84GBpnS029196@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk> <abe39f780909080451s5723b591kef876931be377df3@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <abe39f780909080451s5723b591kef876931be377df3@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.8
X-Originating-IP: 138.232.66.181
X-Forwarded-For:
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.61 at uibk.ac.at on 138.232.1.140
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:47:36 -0000

It is a bit late, but I would just  like  to say that I  am also interested in
this BoF and further  activities.

Cheers,
Dragana


>
> > Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:33:36 +0100
> > To: re-ecn@ietf.org
> > From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
> > Subject: Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > I'd like to try to arrange a Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Nov at the
> Hiroshima IETF. If so, we have to notify the area directors v soon - by 24:00
> UTC Mon 7 Sep 09. #1 gating function for Area Directors: activity on an ietf
> list.
> >
> > Therefore, pls respond preferably *on this list* if you're interested in
> being involved, no matter how insignificantly, e.g.
> >
> > - you want congestion visibility for other stuff you're doing
> >  (but don't intend to work on it itself)
> > - reviewing docs,
> > - alternative way to achieve congestion exposure
> > - participate in mailing list discussion,
> > - co-authoring docs
> > - design ways to do incremental deployment
> > - using code for other stuff you're doing
> > - thinking up new uses for the protocol
> > - breaking it
> > - analysing benefits/costs
> > - implement protocol
> > - implement a demo
> > - running or participating in trials
> > - standing on the sidelines booing or clapping
> > - whatever
> >
> > Perceived problem:
> > Most people want to work on something finite like a new cool
> non-TCP-friendly congestion control. Less people want to go into an
> pseudo-infinite loop fixing IP to allow other cool stuff to happen. If you
> want something like re-ECN to be there, but don't have the bandwidth to work
> on it, that's cool too - please say this - it's still palpable support. And
> you will be likely to have review comments related to how you want to use it.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> >
> > Bob
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________
> > Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research
> _______________________________________________
> re-ECN mailing list
> re-ECN@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn
>