Re: [re-ECN] FW: New Version Notification for draft-moncaster-congestion-exposure-problem-02

<toby.moncaster@bt.com> Mon, 26 October 2009 10:06 UTC

Return-Path: <toby.moncaster@bt.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB5A3A68A8 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_42=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_91=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UtPV-QYhec3u for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp4.smtp.bt.com (smtp4.smtp.bt.com [217.32.164.151]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD8E3A6808 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from E03MVZ1-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.30.61]) by smtp4.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:06:54 +0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:06:52 -0000
Message-ID: <AEDCAF87EEC94F49BA92EBDD49854CC70D9F3913@E03MVZ1-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net>
In-Reply-To: <4AE4EC4D.70102@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [re-ECN] FW: New Version Notification for draft-moncaster-congestion-exposure-problem-02
Thread-Index: AcpV0uJs+rTHk3N1SXyAwRAQmOh64QAUOrrg
References: <AEDCAF87EEC94F49BA92EBDD49854CC70D9F3143@E03MVZ1-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net> <4AE4EC4D.70102@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
From: <toby.moncaster@bt.com>
To: <menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Oct 2009 10:06:54.0574 (UTC) FILETIME=[0B87C8E0:01CA5624]
Cc: re-ecn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] FW: New Version Notification for draft-moncaster-congestion-exposure-problem-02
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:06:43 -0000

Hi Michael,

Thanks as always for getting your review out so quickly. I am not sure I will have time to do more than a quick pass through the document this afternoon before the cut-off. However I will certainly incorporate your text into the use-cases...

Toby

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Menth [mailto:menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de]
> Sent: 26 October 2009 00:25
> To: Moncaster,T,Toby,DEE1 R
> Cc: re-ECN unIETF list
> Subject: Re: [re-ECN] FW: New Version Notification for draft-moncaster-
> congestion-exposure-problem-02
> 
> Hi Toby,
> 
> I did a review of Sections 1-4. You find my comments in the attached
> doc. I also formulated a use case on meaninful policing,
> differentiating in per-flow and per-customer congestion policing and
> showing that the latter sets incentives for congestion-minimizing
> transport protocols and allows fairer tariffs (rewording required).
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
>     Michael
> 
> toby.moncaster@bt.com schrieb:
> > I have posted an updated version taking into account comments I
> received over the past week or so. Apologies if I have missed any
> comments.
> >
> > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-moncaster-congestion-exposure-problem-
> 02.
> > txt
> >
> > The big missing pieces still are: use cases (I have added a couple of
> sentences suggesting what the end result should look like) and security
> (which Bob is hoping to be able to do - meanwhile I added some rough
> notes that I hope are a start).
> >
> > If anyone has anything to contribute before the ID deadline on Monday
> let me have it by 1200 GMT Monday and I will endeavour to add it...
> >
> > Toby
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > Toby Moncaster, Senior Researcher, Network Infrastructure Practice
> > B54/70 Adastral Park, Ipswich, IP53RE, UK.  +44 7918 901170
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: IETF I-D Submission Tool [mailto:idsubmission@ietf.org]
> > Sent: 23 October 2009 13:30
> > To: Moncaster,T,Toby,DEE1 R
> > Cc: Krug,AL,Louise,DES3 R; menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de;
> > j.araujo@ee.ucl.ac.uk; sblake@extremenetworks.com;
> > richard_woundy@cable.comcast.com
> > Subject: New Version Notification for
> > draft-moncaster-congestion-exposure-problem-02
> >
> >
> > A new version of I-D, draft-moncaster-congestion-exposure-problem-
> 02.txt has been successfuly submitted by T Moncaster and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> >
> > Filename:	 draft-moncaster-congestion-exposure-problem
> > Revision:	 02
> > Title:		 The Need for Congestion Exposure in the Internet
> > Creation_date:	 2009-10-23
> > WG ID:		 Independent Submission
> > Number_of_pages: 19
> >
> > Abstract:
> > The success of the Internet is largely down to the ability to share
> > capacity amongst all users while avoiding congestion collapse.
> > However this relies on the cooperation of all end users to work
> > efficiently - even if everyone uses TCP, a minority of users can
> > command a large share of the network.  To mitigate the growth in this
> > problem over recent years, some ISPs have imposed various controls on
> > traffic using a range of proprietary approaches.  These controls set
> > ISPs in conflict with their customers and with some regulators.
> >
> > The root of the problem lies in the fact the ISPs are unable to see
> > the most important information about the traffic - namely the amount
> > of congestion that traffic is going to cause in the network.  We
> > propose congestion exposure as a possible solution.  This allows
> > packets to carry an accurate prediction of the congestion they expect
> > to cause downstream.  This memo sets out the motivations for
> > congestion exposure and introduces a strawman protocol designed to
> > achieve congestion exposure.
> >
> >
> >
> > The IETF Secretariat.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > re-ECN mailing list
> > re-ECN@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn
> >
> 
> --
> Dr. Michael Menth, Assistant Professor
> University of Wuerzburg, Institute of Computer Science Am Hubland, D-
> 97074 Wuerzburg, Germany, room B206
> phone: (+49)-931/31-86644 (new), fax: (+49)-931/888-6632
> mailto:menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de
> http://www3.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de/research/ngn