Re: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Thu, 10 September 2009 12:10 UTC

Return-Path: <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA25828C169 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.562
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.562 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k40E3AZxowUy for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.fit.nokia.com (mail.fit.nokia.com [195.148.124.195]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B226E3A69CF for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:10:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lars.lan (e701.rooms.aueb.gr [195.251.233.136]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.fit.nokia.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8AC9lIL031870 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:10:32 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from lars.eggert@nokia.com)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1075.2)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-126--600519729; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <200909100351.n8A3pKrK026017@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:09:47 +0300
Message-Id: <EA1DC6BD-CEC1-4EEA-8C72-03AD4C093469@nokia.com>
References: <200909100351.n8A3pKrK026017@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
To: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1075.2)
Cc: re-ECN unIETF list <re-ecn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:10:08 -0000

Hi,

On 2009-9-10, at 6:51, Bob Briscoe wrote:
> Lars Eggert explained to me last night that we will need to provide
> text introducing the BoF - the text that will get advertised in the
> link from the IETF agenda (if the BoF is accepted).

you need to have submitted a BOF proposal by the deadline. See  
RFC5434, Section 2, Step 5.

> The text we produced (that I made far too long) as a proposal to the
> Area Directors is not our final chance - that only gets used for the
> session when the ADs decide which BoFs to accept (14 Sep).

It *is* your final chance in the sense that if that doesn't convince  
the IESG/IAB that we should schedule the BOF, there is no second chance.

What I said yesterday is that once you've passed that hurdle (getting  
a slot), you are then obviously free to further tune the material in  
preparation of the actual BOF.

Lars