Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g?
Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Mon, 28 September 2009 23:55 UTC
Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 6762628C0E8 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.165
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.165 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.434,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OhTChMZ2kLKn for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7399528C0E6 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com;
i=fred@cisco.com; l=1524; q=dns/txt; s=sjiport01001; t=1254182180;
x=1255391780;
h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id:
content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender:
resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:
references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:
list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive;
z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com>|Subject:=20Re: =20[re-ECN]=20Acronym=20for=20BoF=20/=20w-g?|Date:=20Mon,
=2028=20Sep=202009=2016:56:17=20-0700|Message-Id:=20<4C95
CF8E-A81E-488D-B59E-91696A512A04@cisco.com>|To:=20re-ECN
=20unIETF=20list=20<re-ecn@ietf.org>|Cc:=20Bob=20Briscoe
=20<rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>,=20Steven=20J=20Bauer=20<ba
uer@MIT.EDU>|Mime-Version:=201.0=20(Apple=20Message=20fra
mework=20v936)|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit
|In-Reply-To:=20<200909282347.n8SNlk1o030818@bagheera.jun
gle.bt.co.uk>|References:=20<200909281832.n8SIWijX024923@
bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>=20<20090928145822.4asxh56sz7y8g
gcs@webmail.mit.edu>=20<200909282347.n8SNlk1o030818@baghe
era.jungle.bt.co.uk>; bh=KWae0fv9sHjK30zEOOwli9k+nG3pTdDR8QJcnLm2x+4=;
b=Cc1CNCouj8O5CocflawfSi/LFHuuZZjXbCiifLSfOI4401OBaoCCEC2c
IZrMfY2QwveA4yQIBQ6m9uq2Ah4182a0AV6FkosObSHvHOsxRcyHd4Zew
W1q95OAptHDTxN7fedIyeGcDA4NXzhtAO1d+GPkZmq9hZgSGIhW4ko1Lm c=;
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-1.cisco.com;
dkim=pass (signature verified [TEST])
header.i=fred@cisco.com
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAGfqwEqrR7PE/2dsb2JhbADABYhTASsIjisFgkMIgVM
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,469,1249257600"; d="scan'208";a="248161621"
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com
with ESMTP; 28 Sep 2009 23:56:20 +0000
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238]) by
sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n8SNuKco021575;
Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:56:20 -0700
Received: from stealth-10-32-244-221.cisco.com
(stealth-10-32-244-221.cisco.com [10.32.244.221]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com
(8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8SNuKDo018015; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 23:56:20 GMT
Message-Id: <4C95CF8E-A81E-488D-B59E-91696A512A04@cisco.com>
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
To: re-ECN unIETF list <re-ecn@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <200909282347.n8SNlk1o030818@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:56:17 -0700
References: <200909281832.n8SIWijX024923@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
<20090928145822.4asxh56sz7y8ggcs@webmail.mit.edu>
<200909282347.n8SNlk1o030818@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1524; t=1254182180;
x=1255046180; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002;
h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com;
z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com>
|Subject:=20Re=3A=20[re-ECN]=20Acronym=20for=20BoF=20/=20w- g? |Sender:=20;
bh=KWae0fv9sHjK30zEOOwli9k+nG3pTdDR8QJcnLm2x+4=;
b=IqmV55tWpuY7q1comab2C2KtbNagu8XYg0CmVRjrTzejVtRi4D0Zl2BvTL
g+f41EXJlBPDMMcCejW9v48rROLj0hSjvnfxWbZSD0l2ylkFVZ29esvMyHi3 ie+56YS4X/;
Cc: Steven J Bauer <bauer@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 23:55:02 -0000
OK, folks. Here's a poll. I hapen to have a doodle account and have not set up a surveymonkey account, so if we're using mine, we use the one we've got. Setup took under two minutes. http://doodle.com/p7fvfpfebtey4xvp This doodle poll lists the options Bob gave us in email. You can select as many or as few as you like, but only do it once. On Sep 28, 2009, at 4:47 PM, Bob Briscoe wrote: > Folks, > > I'm running a workshop the next two days. If a volunteer wants to > take up Steve's suggestion below, pls do... I won't have time until > Thu. > > > Bob > > At 19:58 28/09/2009, Steven J Bauer wrote: >>> Can someone suggest a way to decide between the ideas proposed so >>> far below, >>> rather than just going round and round on the list? >> >> One possibility I have used in the past is: >> >> http://www.surveymonkey.com >> >> Up to 100 responses, which should be adequate for us, is free. >> >> Survey design is very easy. You might for instance have each name >> be ranked >> from 1 (strongly dislike) to 10 (strongly like). You could also >> have an open >> response. (Other forms of questions are possible as well. Setup >> is probably >> 25 minutes. >> >> -Steve > > ________________________________________________________________ > Bob Briscoe, BT Innovate & Design > _______________________________________________ > re-ECN mailing list > re-ECN@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn
- [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? Matthew Ford
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? Scott Brim
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? Kwok Ho Chan
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? Fred Baker
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? Fred Baker
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? Fred Baker
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? Richard Bennett
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? Fred Baker
- [re-ECN] Congestion is relative (was: Re: Acronym… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? ECE Michael Menth
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? DCP Michael Menth
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? DCP toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? DCP toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? DCP Tina TSOU
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? Lars Eggert
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? toby.moncaster
- [re-ECN] Draft Agenda toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? DCE Michael Menth
- Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda Leslie Daigle
- Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda Woundy, Richard
- Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda Leslie Daigle
- Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda toby.moncaster
- [re-ECN] BOF e-ECN Demo (was RE: Draft Agenda) alan.p.smith
- Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda Woundy, Richard
- Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda Woundy, Richard
- Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda alan.p.smith
- Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda Lars Eggert
- Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda Woundy, Richard
- Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda Matt Mathis