Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
João Taveira Araújo <j.araujo@ee.ucl.ac.uk> Sat, 05 September 2009 17:37 UTC
Return-Path: <j.araujo@ee.ucl.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 0AA773A68E3 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Sat, 5 Sep 2009 10:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DnYe0QTzt3OP for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 10:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dax.ee.ucl.ac.uk (dax.ee.ucl.ac.uk [128.40.42.12]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBBBA3A68A6 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Sat, 5 Sep 2009 10:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.65] (host86-176-252-41.range86-176.btcentralplus.com
[86.176.252.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by dax.ee.ucl.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8)
with ESMTP id n85Gvp8W013075 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA
bits=256 verify=NO) for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Sat, 5 Sep 2009 17:57:55 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <4AA29944.3050900@ee.ucl.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 18:00:52 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Taveira_Ara=FAjo?= <j.araujo@ee.ucl.ac.uk>
Organization: UCL
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: re-ecn@ietf.org
References: <200909021633.n82GXbsp012052@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <200909021633.n82GXbsp012052@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-UCL_EE-MailScanner-Information: Please contact mailhelp@ee.ucl.ac.uk for
more information
X-MailScanner-ID: n85Gvp8W013075
X-UCL_EE-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-UCL_EE-MailScanner-From: j.araujo@ee.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 18:16:43 -0000
Hi Bob, As you know, I'm very much interested in re-ECN, particularly in using some of its properties in other areas like TE/routing. I have cycles to spare so feel free to count on me for reviewing/coding/booing and clapping. Cheers, Joao. Bob Briscoe wrote: > Folks, > > I'd like to try to arrange a Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Nov > at the Hiroshima IETF. If so, we have to notify the area directors v > soon - by 24:00 UTC Mon 7 Sep 09. #1 gating function for Area > Directors: activity on an ietf list. > > Therefore, pls respond preferably *on this list* if you're interested > in being involved, no matter how insignificantly, e.g. > > - you want congestion visibility for other stuff you're doing > (but don't intend to work on it itself) > - reviewing docs, > - alternative way to achieve congestion exposure > - participate in mailing list discussion, > - co-authoring docs > - design ways to do incremental deployment > - using code for other stuff you're doing > - thinking up new uses for the protocol > - breaking it > - analysing benefits/costs > - implement protocol > - implement a demo > - running or participating in trials > - standing on the sidelines booing or clapping > - whatever > > Perceived problem: > Most people want to work on something finite like a new cool > non-TCP-friendly congestion control. Less people want to go into an > pseudo-infinite loop fixing IP to allow other cool stuff to happen. If > you want something like re-ECN to be there, but don't have the > bandwidth to work on it, that's cool too - please say this - it's > still palpable support. And you will be likely to have review comments > related to how you want to use it. > > Cheers > > > Bob > > > ________________________________________________________________ > Bob Briscoe, Networks Research Centre, BT Research > _______________________________________________ > re-ECN mailing list > re-ECN@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn
- [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exp… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Michael Welzl
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Soo-Hyun Choi
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Agarwal, Anil
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Woundy, Richard
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Michael Menth
- [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exp… Costas Courcoubetis
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Howard Green
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bruce Davie
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Tom Taylor
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Rolf Winter
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Steven J Bauer
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Kwok Ho Chan
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Richard Bennett
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Don Bowman
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Steven Blake
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Scott Brim
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Matt Mathis
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Janardhan Iyengar
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Varghese Reji-A16389
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Mayutan A.
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… ken carlberg
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Ford, Alan
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Anna Charny (acharny)
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Barbara van Schewick
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… alan.p.smith
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Piers O'Hanlon
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Zaheduzzaman Sarker
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Dragana Damjanovic
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Joe Babiarz
- Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls respond: Do we have a Conge… Aaron Falk
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls respond: Do we have a Conge… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Lixia Zhang
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Piers O'Hanlon
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe