Re: [re-ECN] [conex] Fwd: WG Action: Congestion Exposure (conex)

Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk> Fri, 04 June 2010 15:15 UTC

Return-Path: <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D653A67BD for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 08:15:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.833
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.833 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.350, BAYES_50=0.001, DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX=1.482, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aGgnnovK7o8O for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 08:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.smtp.bt.com (smtp1.smtp.bt.com [217.32.164.137]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B633A67DA for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 08:15:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from i2kc08-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.197.71]) by smtp1.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 4 Jun 2010 16:15:26 +0100
Received: from cbibipnt08.iuser.iroot.adidom.com ([147.149.100.81]) by i2kc08-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 4 Jun 2010 16:15:25 +0100
Received: From bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk ([132.146.168.158]) by cbibipnt08.iuser.iroot.adidom.com (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.399); id 1275664524858; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 16:15:24 +0100
Received: from MUT.jungle.bt.co.uk ([10.215.130.87]) by bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk (8.13.5/8.12.8) with ESMTP id o54FFO5l029451; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 16:15:24 +0100
Message-Id: <201006041515.o54FFO5l029451@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 16:15:26 +0100
To: David Harrington <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <06a701cb03e4$b6e30830$0600a8c0@china.huawei.com>
References: <20100603204841.011D53A68D6@core3.amsl.com> <0CE22F0A-C26B-4F4E-B778-5062AF76ACB5@nokia.com> <201006041149.o54Bn70n026776@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk> <06a701cb03e4$b6e30830$0600a8c0@china.huawei.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 132.146.168.158
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jun 2010 15:15:25.0972 (UTC) FILETIME=[C279B540:01CB03F8]
Cc: re-ecn@ietf.org, conex@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] [conex] Fwd: WG Action: Congestion Exposure (conex)
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 15:15:48 -0000

David,

OK, Will do.

Even if we eventually shut down the re-ECN list, I will ask the IETF 
tools folks to make sure the archive remains accessible.

On Web pages I can edit, I've also changed links advising how to 
post/subscribe to the re-ECN list to point to the new ConEx list.

Cheers


Bob

At 13:51 04/06/2010, David Harrington wrote:
>Hi,
>
>When we moved discussion from the BRIDGE MIB WG to an IEEE ML, we
>automated the WG ML to respond to posters with a message that
>discusion should be taken to <IEEE-ML>, and here are the instructions
>for joining that list.
>
>I recommend a similar approach here.
>
>dbh
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: conex-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:conex-bounces@ietf.org]
> > On Behalf Of Bob Briscoe
> > Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 7:49 AM
> > To: conex@ietf.org
> > Cc: re-ecn@ietf.org list; conex@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [conex] [re-ECN] Fwd: WG Action: Congestion
> > Exposure (conex)
> >
> > Lars,
> >
> > At 08:30 04/06/2010, Lars Eggert wrote:
> > >I leave it up to Bob to decide if he wants to keep the
> > >re-ecn@ietf.org list around; but any CONEX-related discussion
>should
> > >move to conex@ietf.org.
> >
> > Unless anyone objects, I intend to shut down the re-ECN list (in a
> > few days once traffic in response to ongoing threads has died).
> >
> > If there starts to be too much discussion on re-ECN details that are
>
> > beyond the ConEx charter, I'm sure the chairs will let those
> > responsible know, then we can consider reopening a separate re-ECN
> > list. But I don't think we'll get to that bridge and we can
> > cross it if we do.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> >
> >
> > Bob
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________
> > Bob Briscoe,                                BT Innovate & Design
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > conex mailing list
> > conex@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/conex
> >

________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe,                                BT Innovate & Design