Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
ken carlberg <ken.carlberg@gmail.com> Fri, 04 September 2009 18:16 UTC
Return-Path: <ken.carlberg@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 20E2F3A6784 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 4 Sep 2009 11:16:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SzFNSore-qyr for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 11:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f186.google.com (mail-qy0-f186.google.com
[209.85.221.186]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06BE23A63EB for
<re-ecn@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 11:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk16 with SMTP id 16so813274qyk.20 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Fri, 04 Sep 2009 11:16:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:cc:message-id:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date
:references:x-mailer; bh=TNLjQIIXnYEYmKT4sBoM9x/NUlvK2n/RVBkfDlNraIs=;
b=VMLdoHWgLNzPWpyk3ti/jW7uoMpg6ZI5acjjxmNc7Lxz/7axfkKX4BxHS8vqPw0I15
onJ7nwoUdUsQNR01cYJgmkONXeIIepP2dj2lMiZIKejvHuhFg2aYscHYqXkdh/VU8ow2
Qn3cOQjhzniAyfmaGMMPhznJNn1lGmA2QCyS8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=cc:message-id:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer;
b=kETqsaaJTGPNQW5VO2h+Woe/bVFRaJnEssWIMbpeWkh+c4Fl6qaT3fi6H5UlOt3pVX
faXpjMzoi0rDYsUNyqprc8GkG3SyBnwNLxaFsCGuhoLYU/1797TYhRMQeIpfgpWoYy+v
n2QoNC/ZGkWqP6VPBQLuiKRnwAK20yt9TiedE=
Received: by 10.224.96.81 with SMTP id g17mr7651992qan.265.1252086804478;
Fri, 04 Sep 2009 10:53:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?192.168.0.20? (c-76-111-69-4.hsd1.va.comcast.net
[76.111.69.4]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id
23sm722156qyk.7.2009.09.04.10.53.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
Fri, 04 Sep 2009 10:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <39B942B9-5D53-460F-9840-21DFD77837C1@gmail.com>
From: ken carlberg <ken.carlberg@gmail.com>
To: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 13:53:20 -0400
References: <200909041608.n84G8Ztn029170@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 03:15:41 -0700
Cc: re-ecn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 20:12:27 -0000
Bob, Sorry for the tardy response....its vacation time, and so the interest in keeping up with email is kind of last on the list of fun things to do :-) But in response to your request below, I certainly have a strong interest in the re-ECN effort. And depending on what the group gravitates to, I can probably contribute in a more active form -- reviewing, maybe co-authoring, even standing on the sidelines and booing as time and opportunity permits :-) cheers, -ken >> Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:33:36 +0100 >> To: re-ecn@ietf.org >> From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk> >> Subject: Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community? >> >> Folks, >> >> I'd like to try to arrange a Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in >> Nov at the Hiroshima IETF. If so, we have to notify the area >> directors v soon - by 24:00 UTC Mon 7 Sep 09. #1 gating function >> for Area Directors: activity on an ietf list. >> >> Therefore, pls respond preferably *on this list* if you're >> interested in being involved, no matter how insignificantly, e.g. >> >> - you want congestion visibility for other stuff you're doing >> (but don't intend to work on it itself) >> - reviewing docs, >> - alternative way to achieve congestion exposure >> - participate in mailing list discussion, >> - co-authoring docs >> - design ways to do incremental deployment >> - using code for other stuff you're doing >> - thinking up new uses for the protocol >> - breaking it >> - analysing benefits/costs >> - implement protocol >> - implement a demo >> - running or participating in trials >> - standing on the sidelines booing or clapping >> - whatever >> >> Perceived problem: >> Most people want to work on something finite like a new cool non- >> TCP-friendly congestion control. Less people want to go into an >> pseudo-infinite loop fixing IP to allow other cool stuff to happen. >> If you want something like re-ECN to be there, but don't have the >> bandwidth to work on it, that's cool too - please say this - it's >> still palpable support. And you will be likely to have review >> comments related to how you want to use it. >> >> Cheers >> >> >> Bob
- [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exp… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Michael Welzl
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Soo-Hyun Choi
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Agarwal, Anil
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Woundy, Richard
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Michael Menth
- [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exp… Costas Courcoubetis
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Howard Green
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bruce Davie
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Tom Taylor
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Rolf Winter
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Steven J Bauer
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Kwok Ho Chan
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Richard Bennett
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Don Bowman
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Steven Blake
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Scott Brim
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Matt Mathis
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Janardhan Iyengar
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Varghese Reji-A16389
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Mayutan A.
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… ken carlberg
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Ford, Alan
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Anna Charny (acharny)
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Barbara van Schewick
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… alan.p.smith
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Piers O'Hanlon
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Zaheduzzaman Sarker
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Dragana Damjanovic
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Joe Babiarz
- Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls respond: Do we have a Conge… Aaron Falk
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls respond: Do we have a Conge… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Lixia Zhang
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Piers O'Hanlon
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe