Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Congestion Exposure (re-ECN): to BoF or to Bar BoF?
Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk> Fri, 22 May 2009 06:49 UTC
Return-Path: <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id A23D93A6ACA for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Thu, 21 May 2009 23:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.804
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.804 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.313,
BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX=1.482, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xRH0pcJZywRp for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2009 23:49:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.smtp.bt.com (smtp1.smtp.bt.com [217.32.164.137]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66A93A694C for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Thu, 21 May 2009 23:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from i2kc07-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.197.14]) by
smtp1.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Fri, 22 May 2009 07:51:01 +0100
Received: from cbibipnt05.iuser.iroot.adidom.com ([147.149.196.177]) by
i2kc07-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Fri, 22 May 2009 07:51:00 +0100
Received: From bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk ([132.146.168.158]) by
cbibipnt05.iuser.iroot.adidom.com (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.399);
id 1242975055539; Fri, 22 May 2009 07:50:55 +0100
Received: from mut.jungle.bt.co.uk ([10.73.64.19]) by bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk
(8.13.5/8.12.8) with ESMTP id n4M6on2W031172; Fri, 22 May 2009 07:50:50 +0100
Message-Id: <200905220650.n4M6on2W031172@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 07:50:48 +0100
To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <ED0A9E9D-F966-4F9C-98DB-5CE1D3F4C3AC@nokia.com>
References: <200905220155.n4M1tvp2022022@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
<ED0A9E9D-F966-4F9C-98DB-5CE1D3F4C3AC@nokia.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 132.146.168.158
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 May 2009 06:51:01.0108 (UTC)
FILETIME=[AB107340:01C9DAA9]
Cc: re-ECN unIETF list <re-ecn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Congestion Exposure (re-ECN): to BoF or to Bar BoF?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 06:49:30 -0000
Lars, At 03:05 22/05/2009, Lars Eggert wrote: >On 2009-5-22, at 10:56, Bob Briscoe wrote: >>This list has been dead for a while. > >Do you intend to close this list then, or keep it around to organize a >possible future effort (after the tsvarea discussion)? If a community re-forms as hoped, I'd hope to move BoF formation discussion to this re-ecn@ietf.org list. Unless you'd prefer it to remain on tsvarea. Bob >Lars > ________________________________________________________________ Bob Briscoe, Networks Research Centre, BT Research