Re: [re-ECN] ConEx BoF announcement
Matthew Ford <ford@isoc.org> Mon, 12 October 2009 13:56 UTC
Return-Path: <ford@isoc.org>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id E522B3A68AD for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Mon, 12 Oct 2009 06:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.81
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.81 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1,
USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zjtM7t+eiaKR for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 06:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp120.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp120.iad.emailsrvr.com
[207.97.245.120]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12BB93A67DB for
<re-ecn@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 06:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay32.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
relay32.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id DB05B1B4402;
Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:56:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by relay32.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender:
ford-AT-isoc.org) with ESMTPSA id 510441B4158;
Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:56:07 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4AD33576.6040708@isoc.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:56:06 +0100
From: Matthew Ford <ford@isoc.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090915 Thunderbird/3.0b4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Taveira_Ara=FAjo?= <j.araujo@ee.ucl.ac.uk>
References: <4AD3195D.2010806@ee.ucl.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <4AD3195D.2010806@ee.ucl.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: re-ecn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] ConEx BoF announcement
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:56:09 -0000
Hi Joao, This looks pretty good to me - a couple of comments: Please s/internet/Internet I think the final sentence of the third para could use a little work, perhaps: Once ISPs can see rest-of-path congestion, they can accurately and precisely discourage users from causing large volumes of congestion, they can discourage other networks from allowing their users to cause congestion, and they can more meaningfully differentiate between the qualities of services offered from potential connectivity partners. Mat On 12/10/2009 12:56, João Taveira Araújo wrote: > Hi, > > We still need to produce an IETF wide announcement for the ConEx BoF. > I've taken the last iteration of the draft charter, problem statement > and BoF proposal and cut them down. Before bashing please take into > account this announcement: > > - is meant to drum interest, which is why the potential uses are stated > in the first paragraph > - should not focus on technical solutions, so no mention of [re]ECN. > > For clarity's sake we should be looking at keeping it relatively short. > Further detail can be kept for the BoF charter. > > Bash away, > Joao. > > > > _______________________________________________ > re-ECN mailing list > re-ECN@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn
- [re-ECN] ConEx BoF announcement João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] ConEx BoF announcement Matthew Ford
- Re: [re-ECN] ConEx BoF announcement John Leslie
- Re: [re-ECN] ConEx BoF announcement João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] ConEx BoF announcement toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] ConEx BoF announcement João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] ConEx BoF announcement Leslie Daigle
- Re: [re-ECN] ConEx BoF announcement toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] ConEx BoF announcement Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [re-ECN] ConEx BoF announcement philip.eardley