Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?

"Piers O'Hanlon" <p.ohanlon@cs.ucl.ac.uk> Thu, 17 September 2009 12:03 UTC

Return-Path: <p.ohanlon@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5983D3A6ABB for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:03:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gnBjtZJJbKB1 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ew0-f207.google.com (mail-ew0-f207.google.com [209.85.219.207]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4FB33A6AA1 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ew0-f207.google.com with SMTP id 3so460916ewy.42 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0+QbvWNU0fuO7+0pwE//C+YJVsqZooWB0tSrTwFjEy0=; b=srzC7qLhg4sNxeLVDyu80I/DHAAnIs/+N6yrY2HBfRms/E00EMzy9dIisEcXoO3r/D VlyQf+oZoYf/ANsF6FL9P+L/dME0sgx++esKjuXAKjfSK7DlnaWiarRFLK3+frkukL3T +xk+Mf9q6/epYLhe3oNt9YfZQIQ34P5PJBnR4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=S3ZAS+C3rMRSmv2Ps6Mpaa9FEHf5WP2+iEXxStb4VQczhbtwsef0ifhnFUsRPnroh1 TNPnY/wM+Ys22kVprO1Ss7+Cx/bGKhqw9xw2JJTX8pVymvWK1EYT6yU6c3nuHFRPjOID aMhJ+MR1OMOKA/BAC5jDjWVXn18YooPCmAnMw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: p.ohanlon@gmail.com
Received: by 10.211.132.22 with SMTP id j22mr3753512ebn.24.1253189035149; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <200909092106.n89L6HTi021175@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
References: <200909041611.n84GBpnS029196@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk> <abe39f780909080451s5723b591kef876931be377df3@mail.gmail.com> <200909092106.n89L6HTi021175@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
From: "Piers O'Hanlon" <p.ohanlon@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:03:35 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6d3c30043d2e4178
Message-ID: <abe39f780909170503m21327273gfae1367a9510ee99@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: re-ecn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:03:05 -0000

Hi Bob,

We just had a chat about our ECN/RTP draft and wondered what
implications re-ECN (or PCN) would have apart from us avoiding the use
of the Nonce?

Cheers,

Piers

2009/9/9 Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>uk>:
> Piers,
>
> At 12:51 08/09/2009, Piers O'Hanlon wrote:
>>
>> I know I'm a little late but I'd like to register my interest in this
>> BoF. I'm involved in some drafts using ECN for RTP which would be
>> relevant to such work.
>
> If we get moving, you might end up adding re-ECN to RTP at the same time as
> you add ECN :)
>
>
> Bob
>
>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Piers O'Hanlon
>>
>>
>> > Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:33:36 +0100
>> > To: re-ecn@ietf.org
>> > From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
>> > Subject: Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
>> >
>> > Folks,
>> >
>> > I'd like to try to arrange a Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Nov at
>> > the Hiroshima IETF. If so, we have to notify the area directors v soon - by
>> > 24:00 UTC Mon 7 Sep 09. #1 gating function for Area Directors: activity on
>> > an ietf list.
>> >
>> > Therefore, pls respond preferably *on this list* if you're interested in
>> > being involved, no matter how insignificantly, e.g.
>> >
>> > - you want congestion visibility for other stuff you're doing
>> >  (but don't intend to work on it itself)
>> > - reviewing docs,
>> > - alternative way to achieve congestion exposure
>> > - participate in mailing list discussion,
>> > - co-authoring docs
>> > - design ways to do incremental deployment
>> > - using code for other stuff you're doing
>> > - thinking up new uses for the protocol
>> > - breaking it
>> > - analysing benefits/costs
>> > - implement protocol
>> > - implement a demo
>> > - running or participating in trials
>> > - standing on the sidelines booing or clapping
>> > - whatever
>> >
>> > Perceived problem:
>> > Most people want to work on something finite like a new cool
>> > non-TCP-friendly congestion control. Less people want to go into an
>> > pseudo-infinite loop fixing IP to allow other cool stuff to happen. If you
>> > want something like re-ECN to be there, but don't have the bandwidth to work
>> > on it, that's cool too - please say this - it's still palpable support. And
>> > you will be likely to have review comments related to how you want to use
>> > it.
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> >
>> >
>> > Bob
>> >
>> > ________________________________________________________________
>> > Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research
>>
>> ________________________________________________________________
>> Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research
>> _______________________________________________
>> re-ECN mailing list
>> re-ECN@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research
> _______________________________________________
> re-ECN mailing list
> re-ECN@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn
>