Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
"Piers O'Hanlon" <p.ohanlon@cs.ucl.ac.uk> Thu, 17 September 2009 12:03 UTC
Return-Path: <p.ohanlon@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 5983D3A6ABB for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:03:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000,
BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gnBjtZJJbKB1 for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ew0-f207.google.com (mail-ew0-f207.google.com
[209.85.219.207]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4FB33A6AA1 for
<re-ecn@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ew0-f207.google.com with SMTP id 3so460916ewy.42 for
<re-ecn@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=0+QbvWNU0fuO7+0pwE//C+YJVsqZooWB0tSrTwFjEy0=;
b=srzC7qLhg4sNxeLVDyu80I/DHAAnIs/+N6yrY2HBfRms/E00EMzy9dIisEcXoO3r/D
VlyQf+oZoYf/ANsF6FL9P+L/dME0sgx++esKjuXAKjfSK7DlnaWiarRFLK3+frkukL3T
+xk+Mf9q6/epYLhe3oNt9YfZQIQ34P5PJBnR4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
b=S3ZAS+C3rMRSmv2Ps6Mpaa9FEHf5WP2+iEXxStb4VQczhbtwsef0ifhnFUsRPnroh1
TNPnY/wM+Ys22kVprO1Ss7+Cx/bGKhqw9xw2JJTX8pVymvWK1EYT6yU6c3nuHFRPjOID
aMhJ+MR1OMOKA/BAC5jDjWVXn18YooPCmAnMw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: p.ohanlon@gmail.com
Received: by 10.211.132.22 with SMTP id j22mr3753512ebn.24.1253189035149;
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <200909092106.n89L6HTi021175@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
References: <200909041611.n84GBpnS029196@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
<abe39f780909080451s5723b591kef876931be377df3@mail.gmail.com>
<200909092106.n89L6HTi021175@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
From: "Piers O'Hanlon" <p.ohanlon@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:03:35 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6d3c30043d2e4178
Message-ID: <abe39f780909170503m21327273gfae1367a9510ee99@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: re-ecn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:03:05 -0000
Hi Bob, We just had a chat about our ECN/RTP draft and wondered what implications re-ECN (or PCN) would have apart from us avoiding the use of the Nonce? Cheers, Piers 2009/9/9 Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>uk>: > Piers, > > At 12:51 08/09/2009, Piers O'Hanlon wrote: >> >> I know I'm a little late but I'd like to register my interest in this >> BoF. I'm involved in some drafts using ECN for RTP which would be >> relevant to such work. > > If we get moving, you might end up adding re-ECN to RTP at the same time as > you add ECN :) > > > Bob > > >> Cheers, >> >> Piers O'Hanlon >> >> >> > Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:33:36 +0100 >> > To: re-ecn@ietf.org >> > From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk> >> > Subject: Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community? >> > >> > Folks, >> > >> > I'd like to try to arrange a Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Nov at >> > the Hiroshima IETF. If so, we have to notify the area directors v soon - by >> > 24:00 UTC Mon 7 Sep 09. #1 gating function for Area Directors: activity on >> > an ietf list. >> > >> > Therefore, pls respond preferably *on this list* if you're interested in >> > being involved, no matter how insignificantly, e.g. >> > >> > - you want congestion visibility for other stuff you're doing >> > (but don't intend to work on it itself) >> > - reviewing docs, >> > - alternative way to achieve congestion exposure >> > - participate in mailing list discussion, >> > - co-authoring docs >> > - design ways to do incremental deployment >> > - using code for other stuff you're doing >> > - thinking up new uses for the protocol >> > - breaking it >> > - analysing benefits/costs >> > - implement protocol >> > - implement a demo >> > - running or participating in trials >> > - standing on the sidelines booing or clapping >> > - whatever >> > >> > Perceived problem: >> > Most people want to work on something finite like a new cool >> > non-TCP-friendly congestion control. Less people want to go into an >> > pseudo-infinite loop fixing IP to allow other cool stuff to happen. If you >> > want something like re-ECN to be there, but don't have the bandwidth to work >> > on it, that's cool too - please say this - it's still palpable support. And >> > you will be likely to have review comments related to how you want to use >> > it. >> > >> > Cheers >> > >> > >> > Bob >> > >> > ________________________________________________________________ >> > Bob Briscoe, Networks Research Centre, BT Research >> >> ________________________________________________________________ >> Bob Briscoe, Networks Research Centre, BT Research >> _______________________________________________ >> re-ECN mailing list >> re-ECN@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn > > ________________________________________________________________ > Bob Briscoe, Networks Research Centre, BT Research > _______________________________________________ > re-ECN mailing list > re-ECN@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn >
- [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exp… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Michael Welzl
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Soo-Hyun Choi
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Agarwal, Anil
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Woundy, Richard
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Michael Menth
- [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exp… Costas Courcoubetis
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Howard Green
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bruce Davie
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Tom Taylor
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Rolf Winter
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Steven J Bauer
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Kwok Ho Chan
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Richard Bennett
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Don Bowman
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Steven Blake
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Scott Brim
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Matt Mathis
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Janardhan Iyengar
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Varghese Reji-A16389
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Mayutan A.
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… ken carlberg
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Ford, Alan
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Anna Charny (acharny)
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Barbara van Schewick
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… alan.p.smith
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Piers O'Hanlon
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Zaheduzzaman Sarker
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Dragana Damjanovic
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Joe Babiarz
- Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls respond: Do we have a Conge… Aaron Falk
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls respond: Do we have a Conge… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Lixia Zhang
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Piers O'Hanlon
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe