Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text
João Taveira Araújo <j.araujo@ee.ucl.ac.uk> Sun, 25 October 2009 23:53 UTC
Return-Path: <j.araujo@ee.ucl.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id B92FB3A6A19 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Sun, 25 Oct 2009 16:53:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dsJ3apTSptOZ for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 16:53:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dax.ee.ucl.ac.uk (dax.ee.ucl.ac.uk [128.40.42.12]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8533A6A18 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Sun, 25 Oct 2009 16:53:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.64]
(host86-177-114-148.range86-177.btcentralplus.com [86.177.114.148])
(authenticated bits=0) by dax.ee.ucl.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id
n9PNroPP018104 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256
verify=NO); Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:53:55 GMT
Message-ID: <4AE4E509.1090008@ee.ucl.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:53:45 +0000
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Taveira_Ara=FAjo?= <j.araujo@ee.ucl.ac.uk>
Organization: UCL
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Leslie Daigle <leslie@thinkingcat.com>
References: <4A916DBC72536E419A0BD955EDECEDEC0636399B@E03MVB1-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net> <4ADD187E.6000200@thinkingcat.com> <200910221807.n9MI7P2a002071@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
<4AE26D76.7090701@thinkingcat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4AE26D76.7090701@thinkingcat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-UCL_EE-MailScanner-Information: Please contact mailhelp@ee.ucl.ac.uk for
more information
X-MailScanner-ID: n9PNroPP018104
X-UCL_EE-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-UCL_EE-MailScanner-From: j.araujo@ee.ucl.ac.uk
Cc: re-ecn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:53:53 -0000
Hi, Here goes an attempt at making this paragraph a little less confusing by splitting it in two and a bit of rephrasing. The last sentence is still a little confusing though. Leslie Daigle wrote: > <on the wiki, to be replaced:> > The Internet is, in essence, about pooling resources. The ability to > share capacity has been paramount to its success and has traditionally > been managed through the voluntary use of TCP congestion control. > However, TCP alone is unable to prevent bandwidth intensive > applications, such as peer-to-peer or streaming video, from causing > enough congestion over time to severely limit the user-experience of > many other users. This has led ISPs to deploy ad-hoc solutions such as > volume accounting, rate policing and deep packet inspection in an > attempt to distribute capacity differently. The consequences of such > practices are increasingly leading to calls for government regulations > and stifling innovation at the transport and application layer (see > for example, the problem statement I-D (ref below) and RFC5594). > </on the wiki> <my attempt> However, TCP alone provides neither the means nor the incentives for applications to limit the congestion they inflict on others, resulting in a troubled coexistence between applications with differing needs. High traffic applications, such as peer-to-peer or streaming video, are unable or unwilling to restrain themselves from causing enough congestion over time to severely limit the user-experience of many other users. This has led ISPs to deploy ad-hoc solutions such as volume accounting, rate policing and deep packet inspection in an attempt to distribute capacity differently. Such practices ostracize an entire class of applications for simply attempting to pool available capacity, consequently stifling innovation at the transport and application layer, as well as increasingly leading to calls for government regulations (see for example, the problem statement I-D (ref below) and RFC5594). </my attempt> Cheers, Joao
- [re-ECN] ConEx BoF announcement text philip.eardley
- [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text Leslie Daigle
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text Leslie Daigle
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text philip.eardley
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text Leslie Daigle
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text bmanning
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text Leslie Daigle
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text Richard Bennett
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text Richard Bennett
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text philip.eardley
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text Kwok Ho Chan
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text John Leslie
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text Leslie Daigle
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text Fred Baker
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text Ilpo Järvinen
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text Fred Baker
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text Ilpo Järvinen
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text Fred Baker
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text Leslie Daigle
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text Leslie Daigle
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text Ilpo Järvinen
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text John Leslie
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text philip.eardley
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] FW: ConEx BoF announcement text philip.eardley