Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?

"Agarwal, Anil" <Anil.Agarwal@viasat.com> Wed, 02 September 2009 18:15 UTC

Return-Path: <anil.agarwal@viasat.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B0D73A70E3 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:15:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f8OxT4z9IcTd for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viasat.com (hawk.viasat.com [12.198.241.145]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D2503A70EA for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([172.31.1.23]) by hawk.viasat.com with ESMTP id 5B7LFJ1.1525923; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:11:28 -0400
Received: from VGAEXCH01.hq.corp.viasat.com ([172.31.1.20]) by VGAEXCH02.hq.corp.viasat.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 2 Sep 2009 14:16:19 -0400
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 14:14:32 -0400
Message-ID: <0B0A20D0B3ECD742AA2514C8DDA3B065029068C3@VGAEXCH01.hq.corp.viasat.com>
In-Reply-To: <200909021633.n82GXbsp012052@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
Thread-index: Acor65gF7Zh6ZqksTAOi2QvCMGJ13QADUOFA
From: "Agarwal, Anil" <Anil.Agarwal@viasat.com>
To: "Bob Briscoe" <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>, <re-ecn@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Sep 2009 18:16:19.0780 (UTC) FILETIME=[78402040:01CA2BF9]
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 18:15:05 -0000

Bob et al,

Yes, I am certainly interested in this topic and want to see it progress
further. I had sent comments on earlier drafts of this doc and will help
contribute to future work.

Anil

Anil Agarwal
ViaSat Inc.
20511 Seneca Meadows Parkway
Germantown, MD 20876
(W) 240-686-4404
 

-----Original Message-----
From: re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Bob Briscoe
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 12:34 PM
To: re-ecn@ietf.org
Subject: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure
community?

Folks,

I'd like to try to arrange a Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Nov 
at the Hiroshima IETF. If so, we have to notify the area directors v 
soon - by 24:00 UTC Mon 7 Sep 09. #1 gating function for Area 
Directors: activity on an ietf list.

Therefore, pls respond preferably *on this list* if you're interested 
in being involved, no matter how insignificantly, e.g.

- you want congestion visibility for other stuff you're doing
   (but don't intend to work on it itself)
- reviewing docs,
- alternative way to achieve congestion exposure
- participate in mailing list discussion,
- co-authoring docs
- design ways to do incremental deployment
- using code for other stuff you're doing
- thinking up new uses for the protocol
- breaking it
- analysing benefits/costs
- implement protocol
- implement a demo
- running or participating in trials
- standing on the sidelines booing or clapping
- whatever

Perceived problem:
Most people want to work on something finite like a new cool 
non-TCP-friendly congestion control. Less people want to go into an 
pseudo-infinite loop fixing IP to allow other cool stuff to happen. 
If you want something like re-ECN to be there, but don't have the 
bandwidth to work on it, that's cool too - please say this - it's 
still palpable support. And you will be likely to have review 
comments related to how you want to use it.

Cheers


Bob


________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research 

_______________________________________________
re-ECN mailing list
re-ECN@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn