Re: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF
"Woundy, Richard" <Richard_Woundy@cable.comcast.com> Thu, 10 September 2009 14:32 UTC
Return-Path: <richard_woundy@cable.comcast.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 1F02E3A685F for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.753
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.753 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.290,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3cSe5XfwWO80 for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from paoakoavas09.cable.comcast.com (paoakoavas09.cable.comcast.com
[208.17.35.58]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4922B3A6866 for
<re-ecn@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([24.40.15.92]) by paoakoavas09.cable.comcast.com with ESMTP id
KP-NTF18.78535563; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:32:56 -0400
Received: from PACDCEXCMB06.cable.comcast.com ([24.40.15.22]) by
PACDCEXCSMTP03.cable.comcast.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:32:57 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:32:56 -0400
Message-ID: <8A82D1BFEDDE7E4597978355239BBBCB05A348@PACDCEXCMB06.cable.comcast.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF
Thread-Index: AcoyD73dw04VGBGmR9mjfdVL/IIMGwAE9ixf
From: "Woundy, Richard" <Richard_Woundy@cable.comcast.com>
To: <lars.eggert@nokia.com>, <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Sep 2009 14:32:57.0710 (UTC)
FILETIME=[974C88E0:01CA3223]
Cc: re-ecn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:32:42 -0000
>you need to have submitted a BOF proposal by the deadline. See RFC5434, Section 2, Step 5. Did we make the deadline? -- Rich
- [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF Lars Eggert
- Re: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF Woundy, Richard
- Re: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF Woundy, Richard
- Re: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF Tom Taylor
- Re: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF Woundy, Richard
- Re: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF Woundy, Richard