Re: [re-ECN] implementations
Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de> Fri, 16 October 2009 10:59 UTC
Return-Path: <mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id B64233A69D3 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.205
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.205 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.745,
BAYES_05=-1.11, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YwFqymPQMOrZ for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailsrv.ikr.uni-stuttgart.de (mailsrv.ikr.uni-stuttgart.de
[129.69.170.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02B103A6800 for
<re-ecn@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from netsrv1.ikr.uni-stuttgart.de (netsrv1-c [10.11.12.12]) by
mailsrv.ikr.uni-stuttgart.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6A443A0B for
<re-ecn@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:59:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (inode21 [10.21.18.11]) by
netsrv1.ikr.uni-stuttgart.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448E6BC07E for
<re-ecn@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:59:33 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mirja =?iso-8859-1?q?K=FChlewind?=
<mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de>
To: re-ecn@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:00:05 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 (enterprise35 0.20090731.1005176)
References: <4AD7A078.8000100@thinkingcat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4AD7A078.8000100@thinkingcat.com>
X-KMail-QuotePrefix: >
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200910161300.05123.mkuehle@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de>
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] implementations
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:59:30 -0000
Hi, I have an implementation on a Linux kernel 2.6.26. It implements the whole specification but with (just) packet counting. I'm using the implementation with the Network Simulation Cradle (NSC) and our own simulation library. Mirja On Friday 16 October 2009 00:21:44 Leslie Daigle wrote: > Hi, > > Following up an off-list suggestion -- we've heard passing references to > re-ecn implementations, but it would probably be good to be able to be a > bit more authoritative. > > If you've done such implementation work -- I'm happy to collect > references here and at least have a slide up in Hiroshima to list > them/provide further pointers for people. > > Thanks, > Leslie.
- [re-ECN] implementations Leslie Daigle
- Re: [re-ECN] implementations toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] implementations alan.p.smith
- Re: [re-ECN] implementations Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [re-ECN] implementations Don Bowman
- Re: [re-ECN] implementations Matt Mathis
- Re: [re-ECN] implementations Don Bowman
- Re: [re-ECN] implementations Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] implementations Don Bowman
- Re: [re-ECN] implementations Bob Briscoe
- [re-ECN] What do we mean by "Congestion" John Leslie
- Re: [re-ECN] What do we mean by "Congestion" Don Bowman
- Re: [re-ECN] implementations Don Bowman
- Re: [re-ECN] What do we mean by "Congestion" Bob Briscoe