Re: [re-ECN] use cases in charter? Was: Re: Two questions about CONEX

Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk> Tue, 18 May 2010 12:49 UTC

Return-Path: <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03A63A6A2C for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 May 2010 05:49:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.197, BAYES_40=-0.185, DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX=1.482, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NnfAzhRiGkPJ for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 May 2010 05:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp4.smtp.bt.com (smtp4.smtp.bt.com [217.32.164.151]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316713A6B1E for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 May 2010 05:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from i2kc06-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.197.70]) by smtp4.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 18 May 2010 13:48:41 +0100
Received: from cbibipnt05.iuser.iroot.adidom.com ([147.149.196.177]) by i2kc06-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 18 May 2010 13:48:08 +0100
Received: From bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk ([132.146.168.158]) by cbibipnt05.iuser.iroot.adidom.com (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.399); id 1274186886865; Tue, 18 May 2010 13:48:06 +0100
Received: from MUT.jungle.bt.co.uk ([10.215.130.87]) by bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk (8.13.5/8.12.8) with ESMTP id o4ICm5Co012582; Tue, 18 May 2010 13:48:05 +0100
Message-Id: <201005181248.o4ICm5Co012582@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 13:48:10 +0100
To: Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de>
From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <201005181433.50023.mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de>
References: <4BE5039A.5040003@cisco.com> <4BE85D4C.3030001@juniper.net> <084AC2D4-1BB4-4AAA-82DF-B87967508400@cisco.com> <201005181433.50023.mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 132.146.168.158
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 May 2010 12:48:08.0397 (UTC) FILETIME=[5DD907D0:01CAF688]
Cc: re-ecn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] use cases in charter? Was: Re: Two questions about CONEX
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 12:49:14 -0000

Mirje,

At 13:33 18/05/2010, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote:
>Btw. shouldn't the current charter be on the following page...?
>http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/tsv/trac/wiki/re-ECN
>
>And I guess the URL should be change to 'conex' instead of 're-ECN' at a
>time...?

Some time ago, Lars decided to keep the mailing list (and by 
extension this WiKi page) with the current name until a w-g is 
chartered - just in case the IESG wanted a different name from ConEx 
for the w-g.

However, I doubt he expected the IESG would still be deciding...


Bob


________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe,                                BT Innovate & Design