IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [re-ECN] ConEx BoF announcement

Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de> Thu, 15 October 2009 11:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6885C3A68F8 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.949
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lPnTeMaohb5k for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:17:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailsrv.ikr.uni-stuttgart.de (mailsrv.ikr.uni-stuttgart.de [129.69.170.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F423A68DA for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:17:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from netsrv1.ikr.uni-stuttgart.de (netsrv1-c [10.11.12.12]) by mailsrv.ikr.uni-stuttgart.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F30439F4 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:17:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (inode21 [10.21.18.11]) by netsrv1.ikr.uni-stuttgart.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C341DBC07E for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:17:53 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mirja =?iso-8859-1?q?K=FChlewind?= <mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de>
To: re-ecn@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:18:24 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 (enterprise35 0.20090731.1005176)
References: <4AD3195D.2010806@ee.ucl.ac.uk> <4AD63F5B.8020405@ee.ucl.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <4AD63F5B.8020405@ee.ucl.ac.uk>
X-KMail-QuotePrefix: >
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200910151318.24933.mkuehle@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de>
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] ConEx BoF announcement
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:17:52 -0000

Sounds great. 

Just the second paragraph doesn't really fit. Saying "... free transport 
protocols from constraints such as TCP friendliness or flow fairness." is not 
motivated at this point and feels misplaced. 
I would either put this paragraph before the last one or rewrite it to 
something like "... how congestion exposure can give an incentive to control 
one's impact on the network (in an endpoint) beside TCP congestion-control".

Mirja  


On Wednesday 14 October 2009 23:15:07 João Taveira Araújo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the mash-up of the announcement taking into account list
> feedback. I've broken the first paragraph in two to make it less
> cluttered. It makes the intro sound less enticing, but at least it
> doesn't sound like magic now.
>
> It's also a little longer than originally intended, but I'll let the BoF
> chairs put the finishing touches. This should be pretty much complete by
> tomorrow, so any feedback until then is welcome.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email