Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
"Ford, Alan" <alan.ford@roke.co.uk> Sun, 06 September 2009 14:40 UTC
Return-Path: <alan.ford@roke.co.uk>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id ACE813A6817 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Sun, 6 Sep 2009 07:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.871,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fWNbHcxcc2Qt for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Sep 2009 07:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rsys002x.roke.co.uk (rsys002x.roke.co.uk [193.118.201.109]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9733A63EB for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Sun, 6 Sep 2009 07:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rsys005a.comm.ad.roke.co.uk ([193.118.193.85]) by
rsys002x.roke.co.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n86EfChp006471;
Sun, 6 Sep 2009 15:41:12 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 15:41:09 +0100
Message-ID: <2181C5F19DD0254692452BFF3EAF1D6808590CF7@rsys005a.comm.ad.roke.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <200909021633.n82GXbsp012052@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
Thread-Index: Acor67XKvNME/BZkTPWfG44E9ONhyQDE6bUg
References: <200909021633.n82GXbsp012052@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
From: "Ford, Alan" <alan.ford@roke.co.uk>
To: "Bob Briscoe" <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>, <re-ecn@ietf.org>
X-roke-co-uk-MailScanner-ID: n86EfChp006471
X-roke-co-uk-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-roke-co-uk-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-roke-co-uk-MailScanner-From: alan.ford@roke.co.uk
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 14:41:00 -0000
Bob, all, Whilst I don't have a huge number of cycles to spare (hence catching up with these mails a bit late!) I'd certainly be interested in a BoF (I missed the previous discussions in Stockholm) and am interested in both practical issues of implementation and any potential wider application of the algorithms. Regards, Alan > -----Original Message----- > From: re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Bob Briscoe > Sent: 02 September 2009 17:34 > To: re-ecn@ietf.org > Subject: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community? > > Folks, > > I'd like to try to arrange a Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Nov > at the Hiroshima IETF. If so, we have to notify the area directors v > soon - by 24:00 UTC Mon 7 Sep 09. #1 gating function for Area > Directors: activity on an ietf list. > > Therefore, pls respond preferably *on this list* if you're interested > in being involved, no matter how insignificantly, e.g. > > - you want congestion visibility for other stuff you're doing > (but don't intend to work on it itself) > - reviewing docs, > - alternative way to achieve congestion exposure > - participate in mailing list discussion, > - co-authoring docs > - design ways to do incremental deployment > - using code for other stuff you're doing > - thinking up new uses for the protocol > - breaking it > - analysing benefits/costs > - implement protocol > - implement a demo > - running or participating in trials > - standing on the sidelines booing or clapping > - whatever > > Perceived problem: > Most people want to work on something finite like a new cool > non-TCP-friendly congestion control. Less people want to go into an > pseudo-infinite loop fixing IP to allow other cool stuff to happen. > If you want something like re-ECN to be there, but don't have the > bandwidth to work on it, that's cool too - please say this - it's > still palpable support. And you will be likely to have review > comments related to how you want to use it. > > Cheers > > > Bob > > > ________________________________________________________________ > Bob Briscoe, Networks Research Centre, BT Research > > _______________________________________________ > re-ECN mailing list > re-ECN@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn
- [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exp… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Michael Welzl
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Soo-Hyun Choi
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Agarwal, Anil
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Woundy, Richard
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Michael Menth
- [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exp… Costas Courcoubetis
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Howard Green
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bruce Davie
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Tom Taylor
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Rolf Winter
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Steven J Bauer
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Kwok Ho Chan
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Richard Bennett
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Don Bowman
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Steven Blake
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Scott Brim
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Matt Mathis
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Janardhan Iyengar
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Varghese Reji-A16389
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Mayutan A.
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… ken carlberg
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Ford, Alan
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Anna Charny (acharny)
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Barbara van Schewick
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… alan.p.smith
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Piers O'Hanlon
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Zaheduzzaman Sarker
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Dragana Damjanovic
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Joe Babiarz
- Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls respond: Do we have a Conge… Aaron Falk
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls respond: Do we have a Conge… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Lixia Zhang
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Piers O'Hanlon
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe