Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?

"Ford, Alan" <alan.ford@roke.co.uk> Sun, 06 September 2009 14:40 UTC

Return-Path: <alan.ford@roke.co.uk>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE813A6817 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Sep 2009 07:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.871, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fWNbHcxcc2Qt for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Sep 2009 07:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rsys002x.roke.co.uk (rsys002x.roke.co.uk [193.118.201.109]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9733A63EB for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Sep 2009 07:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rsys005a.comm.ad.roke.co.uk ([193.118.193.85]) by rsys002x.roke.co.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n86EfChp006471; Sun, 6 Sep 2009 15:41:12 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 15:41:09 +0100
Message-ID: <2181C5F19DD0254692452BFF3EAF1D6808590CF7@rsys005a.comm.ad.roke.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <200909021633.n82GXbsp012052@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
Thread-Index: Acor67XKvNME/BZkTPWfG44E9ONhyQDE6bUg
References: <200909021633.n82GXbsp012052@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
From: "Ford, Alan" <alan.ford@roke.co.uk>
To: "Bob Briscoe" <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>, <re-ecn@ietf.org>
X-roke-co-uk-MailScanner-ID: n86EfChp006471
X-roke-co-uk-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-roke-co-uk-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-roke-co-uk-MailScanner-From: alan.ford@roke.co.uk
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 14:41:00 -0000

Bob, all,

Whilst I don't have a huge number of cycles to spare (hence catching up
with these mails a bit late!) I'd certainly be interested in a BoF (I
missed the previous discussions in Stockholm) and am interested in both
practical issues of implementation and any potential wider application
of the algorithms.

Regards,
Alan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of
> Bob Briscoe
> Sent: 02 September 2009 17:34
> To: re-ecn@ietf.org
> Subject: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure
community?
> 
> Folks,
> 
> I'd like to try to arrange a Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Nov
> at the Hiroshima IETF. If so, we have to notify the area directors v
> soon - by 24:00 UTC Mon 7 Sep 09. #1 gating function for Area
> Directors: activity on an ietf list.
> 
> Therefore, pls respond preferably *on this list* if you're interested
> in being involved, no matter how insignificantly, e.g.
> 
> - you want congestion visibility for other stuff you're doing
>    (but don't intend to work on it itself)
> - reviewing docs,
> - alternative way to achieve congestion exposure
> - participate in mailing list discussion,
> - co-authoring docs
> - design ways to do incremental deployment
> - using code for other stuff you're doing
> - thinking up new uses for the protocol
> - breaking it
> - analysing benefits/costs
> - implement protocol
> - implement a demo
> - running or participating in trials
> - standing on the sidelines booing or clapping
> - whatever
> 
> Perceived problem:
> Most people want to work on something finite like a new cool
> non-TCP-friendly congestion control. Less people want to go into an
> pseudo-infinite loop fixing IP to allow other cool stuff to happen.
> If you want something like re-ECN to be there, but don't have the
> bandwidth to work on it, that's cool too - please say this - it's
> still palpable support. And you will be likely to have review
> comments related to how you want to use it.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> 
> Bob
> 
> 
> ________________________________________________________________
> Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research
> 
> _______________________________________________
> re-ECN mailing list
> re-ECN@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn