Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk> Sun, 06 September 2009 15:09 UTC
Return-Path: <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 94A5D28C11C for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Sun, 6 Sep 2009 08:09:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.678
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.678 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.139,
BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX=1.482, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9ZZCXCp-Mg6t for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Sep 2009 08:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp3.smtp.bt.com (smtp3.smtp.bt.com [217.32.164.138]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8960D28C119 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Sun, 6 Sep 2009 08:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from i2kc08-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.197.71]) by
smtp3.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Sun, 6 Sep 2009 16:09:45 +0100
Received: from cbibipnt08.iuser.iroot.adidom.com ([147.149.100.81]) by
i2kc08-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Sun, 6 Sep 2009 16:09:44 +0100
Received: From bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk ([132.146.168.158]) by
cbibipnt08.iuser.iroot.adidom.com (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.399);
id 1252249783735; Sun, 6 Sep 2009 16:09:43 +0100
Received: from MUT.jungle.bt.co.uk ([10.73.192.44]) by
bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk (8.13.5/8.12.8) with ESMTP id n86F9eT2012251;
Sun, 6 Sep 2009 16:09:40 +0100
Message-Id: <200909061509.n86F9eT2012251@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 16:09:23 +0100
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o?= Taveira =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ara=FAjo?=
<j.araujo@ee.ucl.ac.uk>
From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <4AA29944.3050900@ee.ucl.ac.uk>
References: <200909021633.n82GXbsp012052@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
<4AA29944.3050900@ee.ucl.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 132.146.168.158
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Sep 2009 15:09:44.0968 (UTC)
FILETIME=[11466080:01CA2F04]
Cc: re-ecn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 15:09:27 -0000
João, Thanks for this. As someone who has already implemented re-ECN (at least sufficiently for your ns2 analysis), your contribution will be particularly valuable. Bob At 18:00 05/09/2009, João Taveira Araújo wrote: >Hi Bob, > >As you know, I'm very much interested in re-ECN, >particularly in using some of its properties in >other areas like TE/routing. I have cycles to >spare so feel free to count on me for reviewing/coding/booing and clapping. > >Cheers, >Joao. > >Bob Briscoe wrote: >>Folks, >> >>I'd like to try to arrange a Congestion >>Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Nov at the Hiroshima >>IETF. If so, we have to notify the area >>directors v soon - by 24:00 UTC Mon 7 Sep 09. >>#1 gating function for Area Directors: activity on an ietf list. >> >>Therefore, pls respond preferably *on this >>list* if you're interested in being involved, >>no matter how insignificantly, e.g. >> >>- you want congestion visibility for other stuff you're doing >> (but don't intend to work on it itself) >>- reviewing docs, >>- alternative way to achieve congestion exposure >>- participate in mailing list discussion, >>- co-authoring docs >>- design ways to do incremental deployment >>- using code for other stuff you're doing >>- thinking up new uses for the protocol >>- breaking it >>- analysing benefits/costs >>- implement protocol >>- implement a demo >>- running or participating in trials >>- standing on the sidelines booing or clapping >>- whatever >> >>Perceived problem: >>Most people want to work on something finite >>like a new cool non-TCP-friendly congestion >>control. Less people want to go into an >>pseudo-infinite loop fixing IP to allow other >>cool stuff to happen. If you want something >>like re-ECN to be there, but don't have the >>bandwidth to work on it, that's cool too - >>please say this - it's still palpable support. >>And you will be likely to have review comments >>related to how you want to use it. >> >>Cheers >> >> >>Bob >> >> >>________________________________________________________________ >>Bob Briscoe, Networks Research Centre, BT Research >>_______________________________________________ >>re-ECN mailing list >>re-ECN@ietf.org >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn > >_______________________________________________ >re-ECN mailing list >re-ECN@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn ________________________________________________________________ Bob Briscoe, Networks Research Centre, BT Research
- [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exp… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Michael Welzl
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Soo-Hyun Choi
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Agarwal, Anil
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Woundy, Richard
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Michael Menth
- [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exp… Costas Courcoubetis
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Howard Green
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bruce Davie
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Tom Taylor
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Rolf Winter
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Steven J Bauer
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Kwok Ho Chan
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Richard Bennett
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Don Bowman
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Steven Blake
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Scott Brim
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Matt Mathis
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Janardhan Iyengar
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Varghese Reji-A16389
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Mayutan A.
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… ken carlberg
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Ford, Alan
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Anna Charny (acharny)
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Barbara van Schewick
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… alan.p.smith
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Piers O'Hanlon
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Zaheduzzaman Sarker
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Dragana Damjanovic
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Joe Babiarz
- Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls respond: Do we have a Conge… Aaron Falk
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls respond: Do we have a Conge… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Lixia Zhang
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Piers O'Hanlon
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe