Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?

"Rolf Winter" <Rolf.Winter@nw.neclab.eu> Fri, 04 September 2009 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <Rolf.Winter@nw.neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C664F3A6801 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 11:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.15
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.15 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.449, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9vN-bHV0tqjp for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 11:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp0.neclab.eu (smtp0.neclab.eu [195.37.70.41]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D533A67F7 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 11:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp0.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C4612C0204A6 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 20:03:10 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (atlas2.office)
Received: from smtp0.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas2.office [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iuS+guJ7LuyP for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 20:03:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from VENUS.office (mx2.office [192.168.24.15]) by smtp0.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41292C0204A2 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 20:03:04 +0200 (CEST)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 20:03:02 +0200
Message-ID: <547F018265F92642B577B986577D671CBF8EAC@VENUS.office>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
Thread-Index: AcotifHBlVZcUB/kQ9qleC7jOt4+0g==
From: "Rolf Winter" <Rolf.Winter@nw.neclab.eu>
To: <re-ecn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:29:35 -0000

Hi,

I personally am interested in this. I think re-ECN is an interesting endeavor and has significant potential. Regarding the experiments you mentioned in an earlier Email, do you have something in particular mind how these might look like?

Best,

	Rolf


>Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:33:36 +0100
>To: re-ecn@ietf.org
>From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
>Subject: Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
>
>Folks,
>
>I'd like to try to arrange a Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Nov at 
>the Hiroshima IETF. If so, we have to notify the area directors v soon 
>- by 24:00 UTC Mon 7 Sep 09. #1 gating function for Area
>Directors: activity on an ietf list.
>
>Therefore, pls respond preferably *on this list* if you're interested 
>in being involved, no matter how insignificantly, e.g.
>
>- you want congestion visibility for other stuff you're doing
>   (but don't intend to work on it itself)
>- reviewing docs,
>- alternative way to achieve congestion exposure
>- participate in mailing list discussion,
>- co-authoring docs
>- design ways to do incremental deployment
>- using code for other stuff you're doing
>- thinking up new uses for the protocol
>- breaking it
>- analysing benefits/costs
>- implement protocol
>- implement a demo
>- running or participating in trials
>- standing on the sidelines booing or clapping
>- whatever
>
>Perceived problem:
>Most people want to work on something finite like a new cool 
>non-TCP-friendly congestion control. Less people want to go into an 
>pseudo-infinite loop fixing IP to allow other cool stuff to happen.
>If you want something like re-ECN to be there, but don't have the 
>bandwidth to work on it, that's cool too - please say this - it's still 
>palpable support. And you will be likely to have review comments 
>related to how you want to use it.
>
>Cheers
>
>
>Bob
>
>________________________________________________________________
>Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research

NEC Europe Limited | Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL | Registered in England 2832014