IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g?

Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk> Mon, 28 September 2009 23:46 UTC

Return-Path: <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64BD83A6A1A for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:46:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.891
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.891 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.226, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX=1.482, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nxKkkIMIuW9J for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.smtp.bt.com (smtp2.smtp.bt.com [217.32.164.150]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57ECF3A67AC for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from i2kc06-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.197.70]) by smtp2.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:47:51 +0100
Received: from cbibipnt05.iuser.iroot.adidom.com ([147.149.196.177]) by i2kc06-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:47:51 +0100
Received: From bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk ([132.146.168.158]) by cbibipnt05.iuser.iroot.adidom.com (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.399); id 1254181670840; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:47:50 +0100
Received: from MUT.jungle.bt.co.uk ([10.73.192.22]) by bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk (8.13.5/8.12.8) with ESMTP id n8SNlk1o030818; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:47:46 +0100
Message-Id: <200909282347.n8SNlk1o030818@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:47:46 +0100
To: re-ECN unIETF list <re-ecn@ietf.org>
From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20090928145822.4asxh56sz7y8ggcs@webmail.mit.edu>
References: <200909281832.n8SIWijX024923@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk> <20090928145822.4asxh56sz7y8ggcs@webmail.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 132.146.168.158
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Sep 2009 23:47:51.0877 (UTC) FILETIME=[179ABF50:01CA4096]
Cc: Steven J Bauer <bauer@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 23:46:40 -0000

Folks,

I'm running a workshop the next two days. If a volunteer wants to 
take up Steve's suggestion below, pls do... I won't have time until Thu.


Bob

At 19:58 28/09/2009, Steven J Bauer wrote:
>>Can someone suggest a way to decide between the ideas proposed so far below,
>>rather than just going round and round on the list?
>
>One possibility I have used in the past is:
>
>http://www.surveymonkey.com
>
>Up to 100 responses, which should be adequate for us, is free.
>
>Survey design is very easy.  You might for instance have each name be ranked
>from 1 (strongly dislike) to 10 (strongly like).   You could also have an open
>response.  (Other forms of questions are possible as well.  Setup is probably
>25 minutes.
>
>-Steve

________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe,                                BT Innovate & Design

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email