Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
"PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri" <Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel-lucent.be> Sat, 05 September 2009 12:34 UTC
Return-Path: <Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel-lucent.be>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 347483A683B for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Sat, 5 Sep 2009 05:34:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.342,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LEIOWBUWbNIO for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 05:34:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smail2.alcatel.fr (smail2.alcatel.fr [62.23.212.57]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB0353A67F2 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Sat, 5 Sep 2009 05:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from FRVELSBHS02.ad2.ad.alcatel.com
(frvelsbhs02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [155.132.6.74]) by smail2.alcatel.fr
(8.13.8/8.13.8/ICT) with ESMTP id n85CXtl6004439;
Sat, 5 Sep 2009 14:33:55 +0200
Received: from FRVELSMBS22.ad2.ad.alcatel.com ([155.132.6.53]) by
FRVELSBHS02.ad2.ad.alcatel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Sat, 5 Sep 2009 14:33:55 +0200
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CA2E25.21D64FDF"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 14:33:54 +0200
Message-ID: <00275A5B436CA441900CB10936742A3801B7878C@FRVELSMBS22.ad2.ad.alcatel.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
Thread-Index: Acor66FstcD06PbfRe6EfopwB/3H7gCOJcjx
References: <200909021633.n82GXbsp012052@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
From: "PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri" <Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel-lucent.be>
To: "Bob Briscoe" <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>, <re-ecn@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Sep 2009 12:33:55.0513 (UTC)
FILETIME=[22270290:01CA2E25]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 155.132.188.80
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 12:34:39 -0000
I am convinced more work is needed in this area. A BoF should help determining objectives, refine space of investigation (towards specification), and specifically look at interaction/impact on inter-domain / inter-connection and traffic regulation. As involvement, I should (at least) actively participate to the mailing list discussions, and review/comment on documents. Thanks, -dimitri. -----Original Message----- From: re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Bob Briscoe Sent: Wed 02/09/2009 18:33 To: re-ecn@ietf.org Subject: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community? Folks, I'd like to try to arrange a Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Nov at the Hiroshima IETF. If so, we have to notify the area directors v soon - by 24:00 UTC Mon 7 Sep 09. #1 gating function for Area Directors: activity on an ietf list. Therefore, pls respond preferably *on this list* if you're interested in being involved, no matter how insignificantly, e.g. - you want congestion visibility for other stuff you're doing (but don't intend to work on it itself) - reviewing docs, - alternative way to achieve congestion exposure - participate in mailing list discussion, - co-authoring docs - design ways to do incremental deployment - using code for other stuff you're doing - thinking up new uses for the protocol - breaking it - analysing benefits/costs - implement protocol - implement a demo - running or participating in trials - standing on the sidelines booing or clapping - whatever Perceived problem: Most people want to work on something finite like a new cool non-TCP-friendly congestion control. Less people want to go into an pseudo-infinite loop fixing IP to allow other cool stuff to happen. If you want something like re-ECN to be there, but don't have the bandwidth to work on it, that's cool too - please say this - it's still palpable support. And you will be likely to have review comments related to how you want to use it. Cheers Bob ________________________________________________________________ Bob Briscoe, Networks Research Centre, BT Research _______________________________________________ re-ECN mailing list re-ECN@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn
- [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exp… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Michael Welzl
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Soo-Hyun Choi
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Agarwal, Anil
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Woundy, Richard
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Michael Menth
- [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exp… Costas Courcoubetis
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Howard Green
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bruce Davie
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Tom Taylor
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Rolf Winter
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Steven J Bauer
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Kwok Ho Chan
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Richard Bennett
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Don Bowman
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Steven Blake
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Scott Brim
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Matt Mathis
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Janardhan Iyengar
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Varghese Reji-A16389
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Mayutan A.
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… ken carlberg
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Ford, Alan
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Anna Charny (acharny)
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Barbara van Schewick
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… alan.p.smith
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Piers O'Hanlon
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Zaheduzzaman Sarker
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Dragana Damjanovic
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Joe Babiarz
- Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls respond: Do we have a Conge… Aaron Falk
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls respond: Do we have a Conge… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Lixia Zhang
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Piers O'Hanlon
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe