IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: WG Action: Congestion Exposure (conex)

Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk> Fri, 04 June 2010 11:49 UTC

Return-Path: <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A4E13A6931 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 04:49:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.066
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.066 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.583, BAYES_50=0.001, DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX=1.482, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VaSyoTlDHzNn for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 04:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp4.smtp.bt.com (smtp4.smtp.bt.com [217.32.164.151]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4AE3A691F for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 04:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from i2kc06-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.197.70]) by smtp4.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:49:10 +0100
Received: from cbibipnt05.iuser.iroot.adidom.com ([147.149.196.177]) by i2kc06-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:49:10 +0100
Received: From bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk ([132.146.168.158]) by cbibipnt05.iuser.iroot.adidom.com (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.399); id 1275652148465; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:49:08 +0100
Received: from MUT.jungle.bt.co.uk ([10.215.130.87]) by bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk (8.13.5/8.12.8) with ESMTP id o54Bn70n026776; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:49:07 +0100
Message-Id: <201006041149.o54Bn70n026776@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 12:49:10 +0100
To: conex@ietf.org
From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <0CE22F0A-C26B-4F4E-B778-5062AF76ACB5@nokia.com>
References: <20100603204841.011D53A68D6@core3.amsl.com> <0CE22F0A-C26B-4F4E-B778-5062AF76ACB5@nokia.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 132.146.168.158
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jun 2010 11:49:10.0798 (UTC) FILETIME=[F24C02E0:01CB03DB]
Cc: "re-ecn@ietf.org list" <re-ecn@ietf.org>, conex@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: WG Action: Congestion Exposure (conex)
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 11:49:35 -0000

Lars,

At 08:30 04/06/2010, Lars Eggert wrote:
>I leave it up to Bob to decide if he wants to keep the 
>re-ecn@ietf.org list around; but any CONEX-related discussion should 
>move to conex@ietf.org.

Unless anyone objects, I intend to shut down the re-ECN list (in a 
few days once traffic in response to ongoing threads has died).

If there starts to be too much discussion on re-ECN details that are 
beyond the ConEx charter, I'm sure the chairs will let those 
responsible know, then we can consider reopening a separate re-ECN 
list. But I don't think we'll get to that bridge and we can cross it if we do.

Cheers



Bob


________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe,                                BT Innovate & Design

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email