IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [re-ECN] implementations

<toby.moncaster@bt.com> Fri, 16 October 2009 08:48 UTC

Return-Path: <toby.moncaster@bt.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF503A67D8 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.400, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lDE2x+027rSE for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp4.smtp.bt.com (smtp4.smtp.bt.com [217.32.164.151]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC8B3A67D2 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from E03MVZ1-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.30.61]) by smtp4.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:48:12 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:48:11 +0100
Message-ID: <AEDCAF87EEC94F49BA92EBDD49854CC70D82EA30@E03MVZ1-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net>
In-Reply-To: <4AD7A078.8000100@thinkingcat.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [re-ECN] implementations
Thread-Index: AcpN5e6fypfu2WlWQru3pS0Jk7K3vgAVqkrA
References: <4AD7A078.8000100@thinkingcat.com>
From: <toby.moncaster@bt.com>
To: <leslie@thinkingcat.com>, <re-ecn@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Oct 2009 08:48:12.0831 (UTC) FILETIME=[65057AF0:01CA4E3D]
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] implementations
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:48:11 -0000

Hi Leslie,

I have a working ns2 implementation of re-ECN (as described in the
current protocol document). It differs from that specification in 2
aspects: firstly it ignores packet size when marking, secondly it lacks
the compatibility mode at present.

Toby



> -----Original Message-----
> From: re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Leslie Daigle
> Sent: 15 October 2009 23:22
> To: re-ecn@ietf.org
> Subject: [re-ECN] implementations
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Following up an off-list suggestion -- we've heard passing references
> to
> re-ecn implementations, but it would probably be good to be able to be
> a
> bit more authoritative.
> 
> If you've done such implementation work -- I'm happy to collect
> references here and at least have a slide up in Hiroshima to list
> them/provide further pointers for people.
> 
> Thanks,
> Leslie.
> 
> --
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Reality:
>       Yours to discover."
>                                  -- ThinkingCat
> Leslie Daigle
> leslie@thinkingcat.com
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> re-ECN mailing list
> re-ECN@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email