[re-ECN] Getting the CONEX BoF off the ground -- Agenda, Announcement
Leslie Daigle <leslie@thinkingcat.com> Tue, 13 October 2009 15:51 UTC
Return-Path: <leslie@thinkingcat.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 86E3428C176 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:51:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.74
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-0.74 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ISAjDJFlnS-F for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zeke.ecotroph.net (zeke.ecotroph.net [70.164.19.155]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FBC93A67EF for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:51:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from beethoven.local ([::ffff:209.183.196.229]) (AUTH: PLAIN leslie,
SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by zeke.ecotroph.net with esmtp;
Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:51:02 -0400 id 015ACA3B.4AD4A1E6.00001FD4
Message-ID: <4AD4A1DE.2040501@thinkingcat.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:50:54 -0400
From: Leslie Daigle <leslie@thinkingcat.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: re-ecn@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [re-ECN] Getting the CONEX BoF off the ground -- Agenda, Announcement
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:51:04 -0000
Hi,
Phil & I, as your newly-minted BoF co-chairs, touched base earlier
today. It seems to us that the key things to get done this week, in
order to get the BoF finalized, are:
1/ Agreed BoF Announcement text
There's already a good thread of discussion on the text -- so this is
just a further reminder for people to engage in that discussion, and
we'll look to close it by the end of the week. (Unless Lars says he
needs it earlier?).
2/ Finalize a draft agenda
I think we're mostly there -- here's the draft agenda as discussed to date:
5 mins administrivia
5 mins introduction by chairs
40 mins the problem
context/motivation
technical problem
20 mins constraints [ <-- renamed from "requirements"]
20 mins towards a solution
overview of re-ECN
demonstration?
20 mins draft charter discussion
10 mins questions and hums
The remaining question is the "demonstration". I've previously
outlined my personal concerns with having a live demonstration, and let
me outline here some thoughts as co-chair on what I believe we want from
that line item on the agenda:
There are 2 key questions that should be on peoples' minds at that point
in the meeting: does this proposal actually produce useful results in
handling traffic (and, if so, what are they)?; is it implementable?
I actually believe this technology discussion has enough momentum that
the second question is not a hugely serious issue here. It certainly
could be handled with "and there will be a demonstration available at
time X, location Y" outside the BoF itself.
So, how do we best, in the limited time of a BoF, address the first
point of clear illustration? I'm positing that it can be well handled
with a presentation of some set slides of data/illustration.
I don't think it is nearly as effective to run a demonstration (however
pretty the pictures it might generate), because it takes time to get
from one set of parameters to another and make sure that everyone in the
room is actually tracking what is happening in real time. Or: doing a
demo right could be a huge time sink, and it isn't clear what it gives
over canned illustrations (and the promise of a demo elsewhere, if
available).
So -- can we get a "yea" for slideware illustration of the technology on
the BoF agenda, demo available elsewhere/when if the logistics get
worked out with the local network?
Thanks,
Leslie.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
"Reality:
Yours to discover."
-- ThinkingCat
Leslie Daigle
leslie@thinkingcat.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------
- [re-ECN] Getting the CONEX BoF off the ground -- … Leslie Daigle