[re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF

Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk> Thu, 10 September 2009 03:50 UTC

Return-Path: <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0360E3A67A2 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 20:50:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.865
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.865 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.252, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX=1.482, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05FKrKuqRhoi for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 20:50:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.smtp.bt.com (smtp2.smtp.bt.com [217.32.164.150]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 108AF3A6907 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 20:50:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from i2kc08-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.197.71]) by smtp2.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:51:24 +0100
Received: from cbibipnt08.iuser.iroot.adidom.com ([147.149.100.81]) by i2kc08-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:51:24 +0100
Received: From bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk ([132.146.168.158]) by cbibipnt08.iuser.iroot.adidom.com (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.399); id 1252554683219; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:51:23 +0100
Received: from MUT.jungle.bt.co.uk ([10.73.61.4]) by bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk (8.13.5/8.12.8) with ESMTP id n8A3pKrK026017 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:51:20 +0100
Message-Id: <200909100351.n8A3pKrK026017@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:51:19 +0100
To: re-ECN unIETF list <re-ecn@ietf.org>
From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 132.146.168.158
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Sep 2009 03:51:24.0558 (UTC) FILETIME=[F797AAE0:01CA31C9]
Subject: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:50:59 -0000

Folks,

Lars Eggert explained to me last night that we will need to provide 
text introducing the BoF - the text that will get advertised in the 
link from the IETF agenda (if the BoF is accepted).

The text we produced (that I made far too long) as a proposal to the 
Area Directors is not our final chance - that only gets used for the 
session when the ADs decide which BoFs to accept (14 Sep). So the 
work on a concise problem statement could be used for this too.

It's probably best if someone else does this text - I'm obviously 
rubbish at being concise.

Volunteers?


Bob



________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research