[re-ECN] Congestion Exposure BoF proposal (draft-00c)
Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk> Mon, 07 September 2009 22:16 UTC
Return-Path: <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id CBC0328C1B6 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Mon, 7 Sep 2009 15:16:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.863
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.863 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.254,
BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX=1.482, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KoL0tLJjw799 for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 15:16:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp3.smtp.bt.com (smtp3.smtp.bt.com [217.32.164.138]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C637F3A69AE for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Mon, 7 Sep 2009 15:16:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from i2kc08-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.197.71]) by
smtp3.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Mon, 7 Sep 2009 23:16:55 +0100
Received: from cbibipnt08.iuser.iroot.adidom.com ([147.149.100.81]) by
i2kc08-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Mon, 7 Sep 2009 23:16:55 +0100
Received: From bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk ([132.146.168.158]) by
cbibipnt08.iuser.iroot.adidom.com (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.399);
id 1252361813454; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 23:16:53 +0100
Received: from MUT.jungle.bt.co.uk ([10.73.61.25]) by bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk
(8.13.5/8.12.8) with ESMTP id n87MGlu8010559 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Mon, 7 Sep 2009 23:16:49 +0100
Message-Id: <200909072216.n87MGlu8010559@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:16:49 +0100
To: re-ECN unIETF list <re-ecn@ietf.org>
From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 132.146.168.158
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Sep 2009 22:16:55.0391 (UTC)
FILETIME=[E89C4EF0:01CA3008]
Subject: [re-ECN] Congestion Exposure BoF proposal (draft-00c)
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 22:16:36 -0000
Folks, Only about 45 minutes to go to the BoF proposal deadline. I've only recently got connectivity again, after landing in Athens. So I've uploaded the draft I was working on, on the plane: <http://bobbriscoe.net/projects/refb/cex-bof-proposal-00c.txt> It doesn't take account of all your comments, which I am now working through. But I thought I would upload so you can read it in parallel to me making final adjustments. In the final analysis, it just has to not say anything stupid - it's a pass to get the proposal consdiered. Bob ________________________________________________________________ Bob Briscoe, Networks Research Centre, BT Research