Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?

"Piers O'Hanlon" <p.ohanlon@cs.ucl.ac.uk> Tue, 08 September 2009 11:51 UTC

Return-Path: <p.ohanlon@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D523A6844 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 04:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qCLuLshEnTcC for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 04:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ew0-f207.google.com (mail-ew0-f207.google.com [209.85.219.207]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C444E3A6834 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 04:51:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ewy3 with SMTP id 3so3404773ewy.42 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 04:51:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ObawubzAkrCzuZv+PSWENOv9m2bbyUsNrtnOc/ReZTA=; b=eog+gXOliDiG4Nn2aZV9jVadZ2EHqZ/51JJoWzJYWgHSN9AvyBBAi4kckMiqbKFWIv dbJMD6fX0JiEg6jyUIlOF9ugzwAkxSD+jJYYZsZ5hm9fH/IY2vYg/WGUJ63Zh8A5/KB9 hQrQa+lsB6qO26Ut0L2gNabxfrK8LI7UHXeKg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=vX6QWWWELuB/rgwKpWTBKKIltfrim/I2D4vcaFCiAb2dr5x0aJIljGlM6XILHbi0a1 chyWvYyFsyGUbTMe/cGqNdTnp8c1i4T51RgyBA/8Tt955YPL3PQ0Mt1AaKG5bc8511on E3srLStIu6eKI3BdG1kfdmS90Wv66aw1waNwY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: p.ohanlon@gmail.com
Received: by 10.211.142.17 with SMTP id u17mr17585109ebn.0.1252410706079; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 04:51:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <200909041611.n84GBpnS029196@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
References: <200909041611.n84GBpnS029196@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
From: "Piers O'Hanlon" <p.ohanlon@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:51:26 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 090b9ac8c2caaa6f
Message-ID: <abe39f780909080451s5723b591kef876931be377df3@mail.gmail.com>
To: re-ecn@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:51:22 -0000

I know I'm a little late but I'd like to register my interest in this
BoF. I'm involved in some drafts using ECN for RTP which would be
relevant to such work.

Cheers,

Piers O'Hanlon


> Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:33:36 +0100
> To: re-ecn@ietf.org
> From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
> Subject: Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
>
> Folks,
>
> I'd like to try to arrange a Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Nov at the Hiroshima IETF. If so, we have to notify the area directors v soon - by 24:00 UTC Mon 7 Sep 09. #1 gating function for Area Directors: activity on an ietf list.
>
> Therefore, pls respond preferably *on this list* if you're interested in being involved, no matter how insignificantly, e.g.
>
> - you want congestion visibility for other stuff you're doing
>  (but don't intend to work on it itself)
> - reviewing docs,
> - alternative way to achieve congestion exposure
> - participate in mailing list discussion,
> - co-authoring docs
> - design ways to do incremental deployment
> - using code for other stuff you're doing
> - thinking up new uses for the protocol
> - breaking it
> - analysing benefits/costs
> - implement protocol
> - implement a demo
> - running or participating in trials
> - standing on the sidelines booing or clapping
> - whatever
>
> Perceived problem:
> Most people want to work on something finite like a new cool non-TCP-friendly congestion control. Less people want to go into an pseudo-infinite loop fixing IP to allow other cool stuff to happen. If you want something like re-ECN to be there, but don't have the bandwidth to work on it, that's cool too - please say this - it's still palpable support. And you will be likely to have review comments related to how you want to use it.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> Bob
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research

________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research