IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF

"Woundy, Richard" <Richard_Woundy@cable.comcast.com> Thu, 10 September 2009 18:05 UTC

Return-Path: <richard_woundy@cable.comcast.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 435D63A6A85 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:05:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.545
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.545 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.918, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id coz7-sW18My9 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:05:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pacdcimo01.cable.comcast.com (PacdcIMO01.cable.comcast.com [24.40.8.145]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4A728C1B7 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:05:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([24.40.15.118]) by pacdcimo01.cable.comcast.com with ESMTP id 5503620.52972976; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:05:43 -0400
Received: from PACDCEXCMB06.cable.comcast.com ([24.40.15.22]) by PACDCEXCSMTP04.cable.comcast.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:05:44 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:05:43 -0400
Message-ID: <8A82D1BFEDDE7E4597978355239BBBCB2A1B75@PACDCEXCMB06.cable.comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <8A82D1BFEDDE7E4597978355239BBBCB05A348@PACDCEXCMB06.cable.comcast.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF
Thread-Index: AcoyD73dw04VGBGmR9mjfdVL/IIMGwAE9ixfAAdjWMA=
References: <8A82D1BFEDDE7E4597978355239BBBCB05A348@PACDCEXCMB06.cable.comcast.com>
From: "Woundy, Richard" <Richard_Woundy@cable.comcast.com>
To: <lars.eggert@nokia.com>, <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Sep 2009 18:05:44.0433 (UTC) FILETIME=[50DBDE10:01CA3241]
Cc: re-ecn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:05:19 -0000

I think I found my own answer (yes, officially), per
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki/WikiStart#Transport.

-- Rich

-----Original Message-----
From: re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Woundy, Richard
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 10:33 AM
To: lars.eggert@nokia.com; rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk
Cc: re-ecn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF

>you need to have submitted a BOF proposal by the deadline. See RFC5434,
Section 2, Step 5.

Did we make the deadline?

-- Rich
_______________________________________________
re-ECN mailing list
re-ECN@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email