Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g?
Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Mon, 28 September 2009 18:51 UTC
Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id B66D53A69F4 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.048,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dAM34aocTNLW for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.26])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702583A6949 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so841370qwi.31 for
<re-ecn@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from
:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to
:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=lhQQl/gjnl1cNFWG7b+ZMtYeyxbC6ZmjDX7SoA6JEks=;
b=SLhNsEpbPs1LPNQ8/+jXUFHptZ0TzomMtomDCejKKWOhbOcmyKjTpJL4Hx8eFrmVPG
kg7zV7pNF9Dm0wUjPTjPbl6HH28Qvg4jBL3KYMJk5z8QkseqYqFr8LakxWrMPxmLA5n8
PrklLKBPapltbn4NyXry7AnirqCIxVikEjHc4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
b=JOmcYnpqzGknx7WnKJFLo4P4V9B80bRhYnRS0fokkNAXOxkKvmqi9pYIu0RsRZ8Nx5
qDwZEgGR71njdD4uP9y134iZhq0vQ6Ys4HqtJmuBWVM82AUjiDyiv/vnOKg/HKV9Fp1W
QXqneyJ1G+a3iZ0RLlKHCsegOPzF0sE19XVPM=
Received: by 10.224.36.91 with SMTP id s27mr3011999qad.136.1254163952440;
Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbrim-mbp.local (198-135-0-233.cisco.com [198.135.0.233]) by
mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm36314qwf.45.2009.09.28.11.52.30
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:52:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4AC105ED.7090201@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:52:29 -0400
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
References: <200909281832.n8SIWijX024923@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <200909281832.n8SIWijX024923@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: re-ECN unIETF list <re-ecn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:51:17 -0000
I don't like any of them. I propose CEEX (pronounced "seeks"). Choose your favorite acronym expansion, several will do. Maybe: congestion experience exposure or congestion experience explicit exposure. If you don't like that, how about CEEEX? Same pronunciation.
- [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? Matthew Ford
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? Scott Brim
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? Kwok Ho Chan
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? Fred Baker
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? Fred Baker
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? Fred Baker
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? Richard Bennett
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? Fred Baker
- [re-ECN] Congestion is relative (was: Re: Acronym… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? ECE Michael Menth
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? DCP Michael Menth
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? DCP toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? DCP toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? DCP Tina TSOU
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? Lars Eggert
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? toby.moncaster
- [re-ECN] Draft Agenda toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] Acronym for BoF / w-g? DCE Michael Menth
- Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda Leslie Daigle
- Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda Woundy, Richard
- Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda Leslie Daigle
- Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda toby.moncaster
- [re-ECN] BOF e-ECN Demo (was RE: Draft Agenda) alan.p.smith
- Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda Woundy, Richard
- Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda Woundy, Richard
- Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda alan.p.smith
- Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda Lars Eggert
- Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda Woundy, Richard
- Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda Matt Mathis