[re-ECN] Congestion Exposure BOF approved

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Mon, 28 September 2009 13:33 UTC

Return-Path: <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B6903A6986; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 06:33:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T3dCyatYB1Ci; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 06:33:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.fit.nokia.com (mail.fit.nokia.com [195.148.124.195]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7915B3A6945; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 06:33:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pc-a80034.wlan.inet.fi (pc-a80034.wlan.inet.fi [194.111.80.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.fit.nokia.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8SDYHWv063480 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:34:25 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from lars.eggert@nokia.com)
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-9-955323645; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:20:30 +0300
To: re-ECN unIETF list <re-ecn@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <0BE56D2A-15FC-4BE4-9BCD-850E91564D36@nokia.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (mail.fit.nokia.com [195.148.124.194]); Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:34:25 +0300 (EEST)
Subject: [re-ECN] Congestion Exposure BOF approved
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:33:27 -0000

Hi,

I just wanted to drop you all a quick note that after the IAB/IESG BOF  
call last Friday, we've approved the Congestion Exposure BOF for the  
next IETF in Hiroshima.

I'll work with the proponents on detailing the BOF agenda and  
assigning some BOF chairs. One bit of feedback from the I* is that the  
proposed charter is lengthy but light on actual proposed work. We need  
a crisper BOF agenda and proposed WG charter.

What acronym do you want to have this scheduled under? CE is a bit too  
generic. It's a bit difficult to change the acronym when going from  
BOF to WG (as experienced with TANA/LEDBAT), so it'd be good it we can  
find a stable one.

Lars

PS: Secretariat (BCC'ed), please earmark an agenda slot for the BOF,  
but wait with the allocation until we know what acronym we'll go with.